My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSP00011
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
1-1000
>
WSP00011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:12:21 PM
Creation date
10/11/2006 9:28:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8149.911
Description
Miscellaneous Small Projects and Project Studies - SE Needs Assessment and PSOP
State
CO
Basin
Arkansas
Water Division
2
Date
8/19/1999
Author
unknown
Title
Arkansas Basin Future Water and Storage Needs Assessment Modeling Approach to Evaluation and Analysis of Proposed Storage Alternatives
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />August 19, 1999 <br /> <br />154'Q <br /> <br />Scenario Analysis <br /> <br />In addition to analysis of each alternative on its own, several configurations which utilize a <br />combination of the alternatives will be analyzed. It is anticipated that project reoperation can be <br />combined with many of the other alternatives to meet storage needs. Therefore, project <br />reoperation in conjunction with the other five capital improvement alternatives will be analyzed. <br />In addition, there are several other combinations of alternatives that could combined. It is <br />difficult to develop these combinations until the results of each of the individual alternatives are <br />realized. Therefore, the combinations of capital improvement alternatives will be selected as <br />results become available. <br /> <br />The analysis will be performed using three different methodologies: <br />I. Total storage is increased using a single or combination of alternatives until all <br />storage requirements are satisfied. <br />2. Combinations of alternatives will be analyzed for subsets of the total demands as <br />provided by the SECWCD Storage Study Committee. <br />3. Each alternative will be analyzed to show its cost per acre-foot of yield. A graph <br />can then be developed which shows the incremental cost per acre-foot of storage <br />required from a composite list of the alternatives. <br /> <br />The following scenario combinations have initially been identified for further study in the <br />scenario analysis, although the scenario analysis will not be limited to these combinations. <br /> <br />I) Reoperations + Pueblo Reservoir Enlargement + Turquoise Reservoir Enlargement <br /> <br /> Potential <br />Alternative Capacitv (ac-ft) <br />Reoperations 90,000 <br />Pueblo Reservoir Enlarl!ement 75,000 <br />Turquoise Reservoir Enlargement 9,000 <br />Scenario Total 174.000 <br /> <br />2) Pueblo Res. Enlargement + Turquoise Res. Enlargement + Lake Meredith Enlargement <br /> <br /> Potential <br />Alternative Capacitv (ac-ft) <br />Pueblo Reservoir Enlargement 75,000 <br />Turquoise Reservoir Enlargement 9,000 <br />Lake Meredith Enlarl!ement 80,000 <br />Scenario Total 164.000 (I) <br /> <br />Note: <br />III This scenorio docs not completcly fullillthc 173.100 ocrc.feet of required slOrogc. <br /> <br />Other combinations of scenarios will be possible to obtain a potential storage capacity of <br />173,100 acre-feel. <br /> <br />10 <br /> <br />u ..... <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.