Laserfiche WebLink
<br />001018 <br /> <br />The major issue for the river is the construction of the Dolores <br />Project. Conservationists point out that the dam will diminish the <br />boating season from 9 years in 10 to 1 year in 5, and that the <br />project is too costly for the benefits realized. Conversely, much <br />local opposition to the study was based on the belief that the study <br />of designation would preclude or modify the Dolores Project. Since <br />Congress excluded the reservoir area from study, it seemed the <br />intent of Congress was that neither study nor designation of the <br />Dolores would interfere with construction of the project. The study <br />team approached the study as if the dam were in place, and based <br />its finding of eligibility on that assumption. <br /> <br />I' <br /> <br />Fear about easements and fee title condemnation were voiced in <br />cases where the river passed near or through private land (no fee <br />title condemnation can take place). Some concern about recrea- <br />tionist-Iandowner conflicts increasing after designation also was <br />expressed. Curtailment of private rights to the use of public land, <br />e.g. mineral extraction and grazing, were other concerns. <br /> <br />The federal study team agencies originally did not recommend the <br />West Dolores be included in the system, but Interior has now <br />agreed with the State of Colorado in recommending its designation, <br />and the Forest Service will not oppose designation. <br /> <br />Conservationists disagreed with the Scenic classification for the <br />Bradfield Ranch to Disappointment Creek; they felt it qualified as <br />Wild. They were also convinced that the reach from the San Miguel <br />to Gateway was eligible as Recreational, on the basis of outstanding <br />scenery, geology, and historic values. <br /> <br />" <br />~ <br /> <br />Ii <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I' <br />I <br /> <br />22 <br />