Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />13. i\ <br />1'.1 <br /> <br />involving storage reservoirs. <br /> <br />0.4.3 Cropping Pattern <br /> <br /> <br />For the preliminary analysis of PIA, a cropping pattern with the <br /> <br /> <br />highest net agricultural returns was used. Table 0.2 identifies <br /> <br /> <br />this cropping pattern as well as the net agricultural return. Lands <br /> <br /> <br />in the McElmo Watershed were located within climatic Zones 0 and E. <br /> <br />0.4.4 Preliminary PIA Analysis <br />A preliminary PIA analysis was performed comparing a parcel's <br />payment capacity with a preliminary estimate of the cost to pump <br />!, <br />water from the river to the parcel. This preliminary water cost was <br />based on the static pumping lift (the difference in ~levation from <br />the water surface in the river to the elevation of the parcel) for <br />gravity irrigated fields or plus a field delivery pressure of 60 psi <br />for sprinkler irrigation. Detailed tabulations of the analysis are <br />shown in Appendix 0.1. Table 0.3 identifies only those parcels with <br />a positive residual payment capacity requiring further <br />consideration. A total of 13 parcels covering 495 acres showed an <br />initial positive residual payment capacity. <br /> <br />An off-farm irrigation transmission system was designed for those <br /> <br /> <br />parcels showing an initial positive residual payment capacity. <br /> <br /> <br />Those calculations are shown in Appendix 0.2 and summarized in Table <br /> <br /> <br />0.4. Parcels with an initial positive payment capacity after <br /> <br /> <br />comparing the residual payment capacity to the cost of water were <br /> <br />9 <br />