My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC07444
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC07444
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:11:00 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:28:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.500
Description
Wild and Scenic - Rio Grande River
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
9/1/1989
Author
DOI-BLM
Title
San Luis Resource Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement - Draft - Volume II - Chapters 4-Appendices
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001591 <br /> <br />CHAPTER 4 <br />Lands and Realty Management <br /> <br />BLM land manageability would improve through acquisition <br />and disposal. This would likely result in a net gain in BLM <br />land and would be based on the lands identified in the <br />existing management framework plans (MFPs). <br /> <br />All existing withdrawals would remain in place, which would <br />result in no adverse effects. New withdrawals would be <br />initiated with appropriate justification. <br /> <br />Areas of Special Concern <br /> <br />Wildlife, scenic, recreation, and wild and scenic river values <br />would be protected on Blanca WHA, Trickle Mountain/ <br />Ford Creek WHA, and the Rio Grande River Corridor <br />SRMA (56,666 acres), which is 41 percent of the total. <br />Special management to protect wildlife, recreation/scenic, <br />cultural, or other unique values on the remaining 80,318 <br />acres (59 percent) would not occur. <br /> <br />Recreation Management <br /> <br />Intensive recreation management of Blanca WHA and the <br />Rio Grande River Corridor SRMA would occur and would <br />enhance wildlife/recreation opportunities on 12,145 acres <br />(2 percent). The primitive or wilderness type experience <br />would be adversely affected without wild and scenic <br />management. Extensive recreation management would <br />maintain recreation opportunities on the remaining 508,532 <br />acres (98 percent). <br /> <br />Table 4-8 shows aHV designated acreages in the planning <br />area. <br /> <br />TABLE 4-8 <br />OHV DESIGNATION <br /> <br />Designation Acres Percent <br />Open 435,005 84 <br />Limited 80,612 15 <br />Closed 5,060 01 <br /> - <br />TOTAL 520,677 100 <br /> <br />An NSa on the Rio Grande River Corridor SRMA would <br />protect 4,395 acres from surface-disturbing activities. A <br />nondiscretionary closure in the WSAs recommended for <br />wilderness designation would protect 3,300 acres of <br /> <br />wilderness values from mineral leasing. These acres would <br />also be closed to disposal of mineral materials. <br /> <br />Preserving riparian zones would enhance scenic and wildlife <br />viewing opportunities on 1,678 acres. Management of the <br />7,750 acres in Blanca WHA would enhance opportunities <br />for fishing, hunting, and wildlife viewing. <br /> <br />limiting aHV use to designated roads and trails in the <br />Blanca and Trickle Mountain WHAs would reduce conflicts <br />between users such as grazing permittees, members of the <br />public viewing wildlife, hikers, and other nonmotorized <br />recreationists. <br /> <br />Additional BLM land gained through access acquisition and <br />road development and improvement would increase <br />camping, hunting, sightseeing, four-wheeling, and snowmo- <br />biling opportunities. Temporary disruption of dispersed types <br />of recreation activities could occur on 150 acres annually. <br /> <br />Acquisition of land adjacent to the Rio Grande River <br />Corridor SRMA would provide additional public access to <br />the area and reduce conflicts between recreationists and <br />private 1andowners. Additional land and access would <br />provide increased recreational opportunities. <br /> <br />Management of Trickle Mountain/Ford Creek WHAs <br />would enhance recreation opportunities on 44,521 acres. <br />Designation of the Rio Grande River Corridor as an SRMA <br />would increase recreation water-based opportunities on <br />4,395 acres, and the primitive and wilderness type experience <br />would be adversely affected on 1,760 acres (8.8 miles of <br />the river) without wild and scenic management. <br /> <br />Significant recreation opportunities in Ihe Rio Grande River <br />Corridor SRMA would be enhanced in this alternative. In <br />Blanca and Trickle Mountain WHAs, recreation opportun- <br />ities would also be enhanced. Dispersed recreational <br />opportunities in the San Luis Extensive Recreation <br />Management Area would remain essentially unchanged. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />Visual Resource Management <br /> <br />Protection of visual resources would not necessarily occur <br />because visual resource management (VRM) criteria would <br />not be followed in all cases. As surface-disturbing actions <br />occur, visual resources would gradually be degraded. <br /> <br />Mineral development would be expected to alter landscapes <br />in a few localized viewsheds. <br /> <br />Forest harvesting practices would be implemented on 1,660 <br />acres of VRM Class II land in scattered localized viewsheds <br />over a period of 120 years. Woodland harvest practices <br />would be implemented on 7,685 acres of VRM Class II <br />areas in a disperred pattern over a period of 175 years. <br /> <br />\ <br />; <br />, <br />I' <br />il <br />! <br /> <br />4-12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.