My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC07406
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC07406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:10:50 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:27:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8062
Description
Federal Water Rights - Colorado Litigation - National Forest ISF Claims - Technical Sutdies
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
8/28/1987
Author
Unknown
Title
Technical Studies - Water Information Management System Handbook - Chapter 30 - Procedure for Quantifying Channel Maintenance Flows
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OOluJ7 <br /> <br />36.1--9 <br /> <br />WATER INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM HANDBOOK <br /> <br />Example - Method E. In this example a request has been made for a special <br />use permit to construct a water diversion in several stream channels on <br />National Forest System lands for the purpose of hydro-power generation. <br />In evaluating the application the hydrologist determines that a potential <br />for adverse channel impacts exists. <br /> <br />The application is presented in early spring and a response is expected <br />within thirty days. Initial examination of maps, photos, and other <br />available data reveals that a gaging station is located in the general <br />vicinity of the streams of interest and is in all major respects <br />hydrologically similar to the points of interest. Several other stations <br />are found within a locale having the same hydrophysiographic <br />characteristics. Further, examination of aerial photo stereo-pairs <br />indicates the likelihood that the channels will not adjust their <br />dimensions in response to frequent flows. <br /> <br />In light of the purpose of quantification, the time frame and the nature <br />of the channels to be quantified, the hydrologist approaches the project <br />in the following manner: <br /> <br />1. The method of choice is Method E. <br /> <br />2. The nearby gaging station is identified as the representative <br />station. (Gander Creek will be used for illustrative purposes.) <br /> <br />3. All of the stations listed in exhibit 1, rows a-I are suitable <br />stations. <br /> <br />4. Watershed area is the watershed characteristics which best <br />correlates with bankfull discharge. <br /> <br />5. To the extent possible bankfull discharge and bankfull discharge <br />channel top width will be determined through field measurements at gaging <br />stations. <br /> <br />6. Where unable to measure discharge and width these data items will <br />be secured using bankfull stage indicators, station stage-discharge <br />relations, and surveyor's level and stadia techniques. <br /> <br />7. Bankfull stage channel top width values will be an average of at <br />least three measurments in a reach. <br /> <br />8. Watershed area will be determined from USGS 7 1/2 minute <br />(1:24000) quadrangles. <br /> <br />Following is the stepwise analysis: <br />Step I - The needed data are found in exhibit 1. <br /> <br />ID No.3 <br />8/28/37 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.