My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC07406
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC07406
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:10:50 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:27:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8062
Description
Federal Water Rights - Colorado Litigation - National Forest ISF Claims - Technical Sutdies
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
8/28/1987
Author
Unknown
Title
Technical Studies - Water Information Management System Handbook - Chapter 30 - Procedure for Quantifying Channel Maintenance Flows
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />00lGD3 <br /> <br />36.1--5 <br /> <br />WATER INFDRMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM HANOBOOK <br /> <br />Step 6 - Bankfull channel top width is measured at the pOint(s) of <br />quantification (Gold Creek in this example), and usin9 the relation of <br />step 5, bankfull discharge is calculated: <br /> <br />QB = 6.53W~.07 <br />= 6.53(24.1)1.D7 <br />= 196.6 cfs <br /> <br />WB ~ 24.1 ft <br /> <br />Step 8 - Proceed to Common Step 1, sec. 36.2, appendix B. <br /> <br />Example - Method C. In this example it is assumed that a basin-wide <br />planning effort has been undertaken for long-range water development <br />planning. The effort has been initiated and largely carried out by <br />another agency. As a result of interagency exchanges of information it <br />becomes evident that USDA Forest Service requirements for channel <br />maintenance flows should be considered along with state and federal <br />fisheries flow requirements. The analysis is being carried out at a <br />fairly high level of resolution. However, due to various constraints the <br />hydrologist is asked to produce reasonable estimates of required flows <br />within a period of four to six weeks with the request being made in late <br />summer. <br /> <br />There are a large number of drainages requiring quantification and study <br />of aerial photographs and maps indicates numerous difficulties of access. <br />This research also indicates the presence of several gaging stations which <br />prove to be representative of proportionate segments of the area under <br />study. A few additional stations are identified as being acceptable for <br />use as suitable stations. <br /> <br />After considering the purpose of the quantification, the limited time <br />frame, the lateness of the field season, and the access difficulties the <br />hydrologist determines that the analysis should be made using mostly <br />existing data. Since few if any sites will be visited it is assumed that, <br />in light of the "weak link" principle and as a practical matter, all <br />drainages have mobile beds and/or banks. <br /> <br />The hydrologist's approach to this project is as follows: <br /> <br />1. The method of choice is Method C. <br /> <br />2. Several stations are identified as each being representative for <br />several points of quantification (only Gander Creek will be used for <br />illustrative purposes). <br /> <br />3. All of the stations listed in exhibit 1, rows a-I are suitable <br />stations. <br /> <br />ID No.3 <br />8/28/87 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.