My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC07298
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC07298
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:10:15 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:23:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.300.12.E
Description
CO River Basin Threatened-Endangered Species - SJ River Recovery - Hydrology Comm - Studies-Reports
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
5
Date
6/18/1999
Author
BOR Keller Bliesner
Title
San Juan Recovery Implementation Program Hydrology Model - Hydrological and Data Model Development - 06-18-99
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001957 <br /> <br />To estimate net depletions, the computer program applies a crop growth stage coefficient to the <br />calculated monthly consumptive use factor to estimate the net monthly consumptive use rate, in <br />inches/acre, for each crop grown. To determine the project consumptive use rate for each subbasin, <br />crop consumptive use rates were weighted based on the Unit crop distribution. For example, if a <br />Unit had a crop distribution of 50 percent alfalfa and 50 percent pasture, 50 percent of alfalfa's <br />consumptive use rate would be added to 50 percent of pasture's consumptive use rate. Crop growth <br />stage coefficient curves can be found in TR 21, Appendix A, "List of Crop Growth Stage Coefficient <br />Curves. " <br /> <br />Other variables required for XCONS are monthly percentage of daylight hours for each station <br />evaluated which are found in TR 21, Table I, pg. 9. For areas not tabulated in TR 21, a linear <br />interpolation is used to match the latitude which is multiplied by 100. The latitude is a weighted <br />average of the latitudes of the weather stations used. For example, the January value for a site at 38 <br />degrees, 31 minutes North latitude would be 684. All crop growth parameters are tabulated in <br />Appendix A.IV. <br /> <br />Irrigated Acres and Cropping Patterns <br />The greatest error in calculating irrigation consumptive use is determining the irrigated acreage for <br />each Unit and associated crop distribution on an annual basis. The methods used were dependent <br />upon data contained in each state's agricultural statistical reports or on supplemental data supplied by <br />the states. In Colorado, the GIS coverage was used to proportion crop types and area by Unit. That <br />is, a Unit, being a combination of County and HUC, has a common cropping pattern and depletion <br />rate. The cropping patterns for a given county were obtained from Colorado Agricultural Statistics <br />(CAS). The State of New Mexico supplied Reclamation with a break down of crop acreage and <br />distribution data by Units excluding NIIP lands (Memoranda dated 6/11/1997 and 9/10/1997 are <br />found in Appendix H). Cropped acreage and distribution data for NIIP lands were obtained from <br />Reclamation's crop summary statistics. Irrigated area in Utah and Arizona are CRSCU&L acres <br />extended through the study period. <br /> <br />Archuleta and La Plata counties were the only Colorado counties which lie entirely within the San <br />Juan River Basin. Dolores, Hinsdale, Mineral, Montezuma, and San Miquel counties are Colorado <br />counties which partially lie outside the San Juan River Basin. Because irrigated crop type acreage is <br />reported on a county-wide basis and is not disaggregated by hydrologic boundaries, the use of the <br />CAS total acreage was deemed inappropriate. GIS data were used to represent the average adjusted <br />county irrigated crop acreage for these counties lying partially outside the San Juan River Basin. Rio <br />Grande, San Miguel and San Juan counties in Colorado have lands which partially lie inside the San <br />Juan River Basin but because the GIS data did not show any irrigated lands in the San Juan River <br />Basin, these areas were excluded from the analysis. Annual Pasture acreage was assumed to be the <br />same as the GIS data. This was determined to be the best approach after comparing the GIS data to <br />the CAS data. <br /> <br />Crops that displayed similar growth characteristics were combined as one crop. Com, as an example, <br />is grown for grain and silage. Usually silage com is harvested earlier than grain com but in the San <br />Juan basin silage com is not harvested until after a killing frost while grain com would not be <br />harvested until after it had spent some time in the field drying. Since both crops ended their growth <br />period at the same time, period of killing frost, they were combined as one crop called com. Most <br />vegetable crops were combined and labeled field crops. <br /> <br />DRAFT - SJRIP Hydrology Model Documentation <br />June 18,1999 <br /> <br />18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.