Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br />002323 <br />, <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />Concurrent to work on the three automated databases described above, work pro- <br />ceeded on the development of a catalog of proposed water and energy development <br />projects in the UCRB. This effort was originally envisioned as support for the <br />hydrologic modeling effort, but because of the slow progress of the modeling <br />effort the catalog was restructured as a reference manual for the field. The <br />catalog contains descriptions of project features, identifies the project spon- <br />sor, location and status with a map locating the project within the basin. The <br />catalog contains descriptions of 11 existing thermoelectric powerplants, 8 pro- <br />posed, g existing major hydroelectric powerplants, 5 proposed, g proposed tar <br />sands projects, 24 proposed oil shale projects, 5 proposed coal gasification <br />.projects, 23 proposed water resource projects, and 8 salinity control projects. <br />~ ~'!he catalog was recently compiled in final form and a limited number of copies <br />--- ~re available from the Regional Office, FWS, Denver, Colorado. <br /> <br /> <br />TASK II - Develop an Aquatic Resouce/Habitat Simulation <br />Model (AR/HSM) for the UCRB <br /> <br />Progress on the development of the AR/HSM has been slow having been hampered by <br />several false starts due to the uncertainty of. funding committed to the effort. <br />The original project goal of developing a completely new, transferable hydrologic <br />model with a flexible network structure which could have been easily changed to <br />accommodate to the addition or removal of tributaries was abandoned due to the <br />loss of EPA funding. Instead, WELUT and Region 6 hydrologists selected the <br />HYDROSS model, which is an existing, documented model developed by the U.S. <br />Bureau of Reclamation in Billings, Montana. HYDROSS has many of the features of <br />the originally proposed model plus it has a record of being accepted by water <br />resource planners. <br /> <br />HYDROSS has now been structured to accommodate 50 node points in the UCRB and <br />data. input files have been created using the same hydrologic data files created <br />for the Colorado River System Simulation (CRSS) model by the Bureau of Reclamation. <br />Currently, work is underway to render HYDROSS fully operational for the UCRB by <br />FWS Regional Office staff. Work is also underway at WELUT in Fort Collins to <br />develop programs to link the hydrologic output of HYDROSS with temperature and <br />biologic models used to predict and quantify stream habitat values. <br /> <br />The models referred to above are the Physical Habitat Simulation Model (PHABSIM) <br />and the Stream Network Temperature Model (SNTM). PHABSII1 projects fishery <br />'habitat over a representative or critical river reach based upon flow, velocity, <br />depth, and substrate. The temperature model tracks stream temperatures throughout <br />the stream network and predicts temperatures at given control points. The <br />temperature model is currently in final development with documentation being <br />prepared. <br /> <br />The goal of the AR/HSM effort is to interface the biological and temperature <br />modeling effort with the hydrologic model to quantify the effect of changes in <br />flow regimes and channel morphology on aquatic habitat. When the models are <br /> <br />\ <br />\ <br />\ <br />