Laserfiche WebLink
<br />O{)13~\) <br /> <br />Seotion 13, subdivision (c), that the Aot provides: <br /> <br />"(c) Also all patents, grants, <br />contracts, ooncessions, leases, permits, <br />licenses, rights cf way, or other privi_ <br />leges from the United States or under <br />its authority, necessary or convenient <br />for the use of waters of the Colorado <br />River or its tribuatries, 'or for the <br />generation or transmission of electrical <br />energy generated by IlI5lUlS of the waters <br />of said river or its tributaries, whether <br />under this act, the Federal water power <br />aot, or otherwise, shall be upon the <br />express condition and with the express <br />covenlll t that the rights of the reoipients <br />or holders trereof to waters of the river <br />or its tributaries, for the use of whioh <br />the same are necessary, oonvenient, or <br />inoidental, and the use of the same' shall <br />likewise be subjecrt to and controlled by <br />said Colorado River Compact." <br /> <br />., <br /> <br />It is, therefore, apparent from a reading of the <br /> <br /> <br />foregoing seotion that the Act compels the Federal Power <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />Commission to recognize the terms of the Colorado River <br /> <br />Compact in every detail in said section mentioned, and <br /> <br />by its provisions so limits the Federal Power Commission <br /> <br />that if Arizona secures a permit or a lioense it must <br />necessarily be governed by the terms of the Project Act and <br />in turn fall. within the terms of the Colorado River Compact, <br /> <br />and in so doing no advantage can be gained by the State of <br /> <br />Arizona. <br /> <br />We respectfully submit that the answer to the <br /> <br /> <br />first question we have heretofore given must be "No". <br /> <br />.. <br /> <br />12. <br />