My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06768
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06768
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:07:44 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:04:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8230.100.10
Description
Colorado River - Interstate Litigation - Arizona Vs California
State
AZ
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
2/28/1955
Author
Elmer Bennet
Title
AZ Vs CA - Legal Documents 1958-1965 - Excerpts from Hearings on S 500 - Statement of Elmer Bennet - 02-28-55 through 03-05-55
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />001834 <br /> <br />j <br /> <br />,2,:. <br /> <br />EXCERPT FROM <br />HEARINGS <br />Before The <br />SUBCOMMITTEE. ON <br />IRRlGA'l'ION Ai'lIJ R.ECLAMATION <br />of the <br />COMMITTEE ON <br />INTER~OR AND INSULAR AFFAIRS <br />UNITED ST2\TES SENATE <br />Eighty-Fourth Congress <br />First Session <br />on <br /> <br />S. 500 <br /> <br />A Bill to Authorize the Secretary of the. Interior to Construct, <br />Operate, and Maintain the Colorado River storage project <br />and Participating Projects, and For Other purposes <br /> <br />February 28, March I, 2, 3, 4 and 5, 1955 <br /> <br />STATEMENT OF ELMER BENNETT, LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL FOR THE DEPARTMENT <br />OF THE IN'l'ElUOR <br /> <br />MIl~ BENNETT. My name is Elmer Bennett. r am legislative counsel <br />for the Department of the Interior. <br /> <br />The purpose of the statement, as I understood Senator Anderson's <br />request, is to deal specifically with those features of the December <br />20 statement of Governor Johnson of Coloiado which bear upon the <br />legislation before this committee. <br /> <br />In the course of the discussion this afternoon, so far as the <br />department is concerned, I wish to make it clear that there were many <br />implications and discussions which involved differences of points of <br />view on priorities of apportionments of water under the compact which <br />in our judgment, are not material to this bill. <br /> <br />Those are now involved in litigation between Arizona and Califor- <br />nia, particularly if in its wisdom the Supreme Court should finally <br />order the joining of the upper basin States in the litigation there. <br />The only questions which bear upon this bill in our judgment are those <br />which Senator Johnson puts this way: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.