Laserfiche WebLink
<br />r (., <br /> <br />3tH <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />./IPage 2 <br /> <br />..I <br /> <br />river flow consisting of controlled releases and <br />tributary inflow, or a flow of forty thousand <br />cubic feet per second (cfs), whichever is <br />greater, from below Davis Dam to the Southerly <br />International Boundary between the United States <br />of America and the Republic of Mexico. <br />The standard level of protection that has been adopted in <br />the administration of the National Flood Insurance Act is the <br />one-in-one hundred year frequency flood. The Corps of Engineers <br />has determined that 40,000 cubic feet per second (cfs) is the <br />maximum release rate that historically would have inflicted a <br />minimum level of downstream damages and has incorporated this <br />flow level in its Hoover Dam flood control regulations <br />continually since 1935. Consequently, the boundaries of the <br />Colorado River Floodway should be capable of accommodating a one- <br />in-one hundred year river flow or a 40,000 cfs flow, whichever is <br />greater, from Davis Dam to the Southerly International Boundary <br />between the United States and Mexico. <br />It is the Comnittee's judgment that the Secretary's <br />analysis of the one-in-one hundred-year river flow should <br />represent a realistic one-in-one hundred-year probability of such <br />flow occurring in any reach of the river at a given time, and <br />should not arbitrarily assume that flood inflows from all <br />tributaries occur simultaneously. It is the nature of weather <br />events along the Lower Colorado River, a desert region, that most <br />rain storms are intense, localized thunder showers that would <br />produce floods from only a few tributaries at a time, and the <br />Secretary's study should reflect this. <br /> <br />Section 6. Limitations on Federal Expenditures Affecting <br />the Floodway. This section states that, except as provided in <br />Section 7, no new expenditures or new financial assistance rray be <br />made available under authority of any Federal law for any purpose <br />within the Floodway. <br /> <br />Section 7. Exceptions. There are several functions and <br />uses of the floodway that serve the public interest, and are <br />generally canpatible with floodway operation. This section <br />recognizes those functions and uses by providing limited <br />exceptions, generally subject to Secretarial discretion, to the <br />prohibition on federal expenditures. These exception'are <br />enumerated as public and tribal roads, military activities, fish <br />and wildlife enhancement projects, navigation aids, emergency <br />action assistanCe, public health assistanCe, public and Tribal <br />recreational developments, and compatible agricultural uses that <br />do not involve permanent crops and include only a minirral amount <br />of permanent facilities in the floodway. <br /> <br />In general, the term "permanent crops" is to mean those <br />crops which have a normal life of five years or more or which <br />would be an obstruction to river' flood flows. In this regard, <br />crops such as alfalfa, grains such as wheat, barley, oats, etc., <br />asparagus, cotton, lettuce, cauliflower, melons, tomatoes, <br />carrots, etc., should not be considered "permanent crops" for the <br />