My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06712
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:07:25 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:01:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.H
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - UCRBRIP - Program Organization-Mission - Stocking
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/4/1997
Author
Tom Nesler CO DOW
Title
Five Year Stocking Plan for Endangered Colorado River Fish Species in Colorado - Draft - 06-04-97
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002826 <br /> <br />Background <br />Within the Upper Basin, stocking plans have been created for only the razorback sucker <br />in the Colorado/Gunnison rivers in Colorado (Burdick et a1. 1995) and in the middle Green <br />River in Utah (Wydoski 1996), and for the bony tail in the Green and Colorado rivers in Utah <br />(Lentsch et al, 1996), These plans were developed when the Recovery Program designated <br />razorback sucker and bonytail as priorities one and two, respectively, for .propagation and <br />stocking due to their extremely precarious status in the wild, Within Colorado in the Colorado <br />and Gunnison rivers, insufficient numbers of wild razorback sucker were available to use in a <br />5x5 breeding matrix to even attempt to develop broodstock. Additionally, the highest number <br />of razorback sucker remaining in Colorado, located in Etter's Pond near Palisade, Colorado, was <br />determined to be dominated by potential siblings from a very small number of parents, and <br />potentially hybridized with tlannelmouth sucker (Genetics Panel, Colorado River Recovery <br />Program, 1994). Therefore, mating crosses between two individual fish from Etter's' Pond was <br />determined to be genetically unacceptable due to inbreeding risks, The Recovery Program <br />approved development of a "blended stock" of razorback to serve as the broodstock for the <br />Colorado and Gunnison rivers, This stock was formed using razorback sucker from the <br />Colorado River arm of Lake Powell (4 fish), the San Juan arm of Lake Powell (4 fish), riverine <br />fish from the upper Colorado River (4 fish), and Etter Pond (3 fish). A captive spawning <br />strategy for these fish is described in Burdick et al' (1995) following the Recovery Program's <br />Genetics Management Guidelines (Williamson and Wydoski 1994). <br /> <br />Bonytail are represented by only one captive broodstock that is currently kept at Dexter <br />National Fish Hatchery in New Mexico, Some of these fish are also being held at Wahweap <br />State Fish Hatchery in Utah for reintroduction and broodstock development purposes, Since <br />these fish are the descendants from limited numbers of wild fish taken from Lake Mohave, and <br />no more viable adult bonytail are currently available from the wild stock remaining in Lake <br />Mohave, these fish represent the only genetic material left from which to base a propagation and <br />reintroduction program, <br /> <br />DRAFT - June 4, 1997 <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.