My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06712
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:07:25 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:01:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.H
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - UCRBRIP - Program Organization-Mission - Stocking
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/4/1997
Author
Tom Nesler CO DOW
Title
Five Year Stocking Plan for Endangered Colorado River Fish Species in Colorado - Draft - 06-04-97
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002836 <br /> <br />Stocking Plan - Colorado squawfIsh (Table 3) <br />Colorado squawfish are designated as the third priority species in this plan. This ranking <br />results from the relative abundance of Colorado squawfish populations in the Yampa, White, and <br />Colorado rivers compared to razorback sucker and bony tail, The primary objective of stocking <br />Colorado squawfish in Colorado is to restore populations in unoccupied riveT reaches upstream <br />of instream barriers, At this time, the development of a Colorado River brood stock is <br />incomplete, and needs to be resumed with the collection of additional adult fish from the <br />Colorado and Gunnison rivers to supplement the 17 family lots created from the 5x5 breeding <br />matrix of Colorado River fish only. It is presumed at this time, since the construction and <br />operation of the Redlands fish passage structure and translocation of adult Colorado squawfish <br />from below the barrier to the river above, that mixing of the genetic material between the <br />populations occurring in the two rivers is expected and desirable, Planning for the acquisition <br />of the necessary fish and development of an acceptable mating strategy to incorporate existing <br />genetic material from Gunnison River Colorado squawfish into the existing broodstock should <br />be initiated as soon as possible by the Propagation Coordinator for the Recovery Program, <br /> <br />The initial development of broodstock for Colorado squawfish from the Grand Valley <br />reach of the Colorado River was conducted according to appropriate guidelines (Williamson and <br />Wydoski 1994), so that this broodstock and its progeny should reflect the genetic diversity <br />present in the wild population, Expansion of the existing broodstock using wild Colorado <br />squawfish from the Gunnison River fish seems logical and appropriate according to the genetics <br />management guidelines, From this perspective, the genetics risks associated with broodstock <br />development are negligible. The risk assessment centers on two issues: (1) the preference for <br />restoration stocking of hatchery-reared fish in unoccupied river reaches located upstream of <br />occupied habitat versus a preference for natural or enhanced (via translocation) recolonization <br />of unoccupied habitat by passage of fish past barriers, and (2) movement of stocked fish <br />downstream into reaches occupied by wild Colorado squawfish, <br /> <br />Osmundson and Burnham (1996) estimated the population size of Colorado squawfish in <br />the Grand Valley reach of the Colorado River to be about 250 fish or 4/mile, and 340-390 fish <br /> <br />DRAFT - June 4, 1997 <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.