My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06712
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:07:25 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:01:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8240.200.10.H
Description
Colorado River Threatened-Endangered - UCRBRIP - Program Organization-Mission - Stocking
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
6/4/1997
Author
Tom Nesler CO DOW
Title
Five Year Stocking Plan for Endangered Colorado River Fish Species in Colorado - Draft - 06-04-97
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />002832 <br /> <br />Further, the following species interactions and recovery actions are anticipated: <br /> <br />1) Razorback sucker biomass increase above 5% will cause reduction in biomass of <br />flannelmouth sucker due to more similar low-velocity habitat use and potential <br />competition, <br />2) Biomass and production of common catp and white sucker will be reduced by control <br />efforts, therefore reducing competitive pressure upon sympatric native suckers, and <br />perhaps facilitating expansion of razorback sucker beyond the 5 % target biomass, <br />3) With successful establishment of an adult razorback sucker population, general abundance <br />of other native species may be reduced as a result of some competition, <br /> <br />Reach priorities were based on the following considerations: <br /> <br />1) The Colorado River (Rifle to Debeque) and Gunnison River reaches are higher priority <br />than the Palisade to Stateline reach of the Colorado River due to the higher relative <br />abundance of native fishes in general and native suckers in particular, and the lack of an <br />abundance of large predaceous fish species; suggesting a more favorable environment for <br />survival. <br />2) Concentrations of selenium that may impact razorback sucker reproduction adversely via <br />survival of larvae appears to be greater in the Gunnison River reach, making the upper <br />Colorado River reach potentially more favorable for reintroduction, and ultimately, <br />successful reproduction and survival of young razorback sucker. <br /> <br />Stocking Plan - Bonytail (Table 2) <br />BonytaiI are considered the second highest priority for stocking, but only due to the high <br />value of expanding the genetic material remaining in the few, viable stocks of razorback sucker <br />left in the wild. BonytaiI are functionally extirpated in the wild and restoration stocking of <br />progeny from the remaining captive stock is the only recourse for re-establishing populations, <br />The source for bonytaiI to be stocked will be from the captive broodstock currently being held <br /> <br />DRAFT - June 4, 1997 <br /> <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.