Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002273 <br /> <br />PART I <br /> <br />I, Water Rights Review <br /> <br />A.. Identify Senior Ditches <br /> <br />lhe Coal Creek Project Formulation Study identified various quantities <br /> <br />of supplemental raw water which would have been required for the four alternative <br /> <br />project facilities reviewed, The specific water rights were not identified due to <br /> <br />the-sensitivity involved, in that undesired speculation would cause inordinate. <br /> <br />price increases, Rocky Mountain Consultants, Incorporated would propose to iden- <br /> <br />tify an appropriation date on South Boulder Creek and recommend that the Coal <br /> <br />Creek entity acquire its supplemental water from rights bearing an earlier decree <br /> <br />date. In this manner, specific water rights would not be identified, If the State <br /> <br />still feels that specific rights should be identified, then Rocky Mountain Con- <br /> <br />sultants, Incorporated would identify a list of approximately .3,000 acre-feet <br /> <br />to 6,000 acre-feet of safe annual yield water from which the communities could <br /> <br />choose the resources best suited to their needs.. <br /> <br />B.. Quantify Water <br /> <br />The number of shares 'outstanding in these senior South Boulder Creek ditches <br /> <br />would be identified, In this manner the volume of water available per share for <br /> <br />average and dry years (1954) conditions would be ascertained, in an amount between <br /> <br />3,000 acre-feet and 6,000 acre-feet per year, <br /> <br />Cost for the above rights will be set forth, <br /> <br />.," . <br />'~-r~ <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />. <br /> <br />, <br />~ <br />1 <br /> <br />l <br />