Laserfiche WebLink
<br />o J l:i 5 '.~ <br /> <br />. Other variables assigned but not used in the Lower Region's version of subroutine <br />APPOR.FOR include: SRPCAP, CFSMAX, NT, and PKRPSCH. These were <br />commented out after reviewing their current operation. <br /> <br />COMPARISON OF RESUL IS: USBR Cyber to PC <br /> <br />Following are the changes implemented to a version of CRSM on the USBR's Cyber in <br />order to test the ability of the model to produce similar results on the PC. These changes <br />were implemented by Bruce Williams of the Lower Region and are understood to have <br />been performed to a file named SEDOUT (binary name B42894). <br /> <br />. The concerns associated with the variables PROB02, ACFT, SURPSN, and SNEP <br />were corrected. <br /> <br />. The CRSM control file which resulted in FORMAT 9080 of subroutine <br />READER. FOR operating improperly was revised. <br /> <br />. Both models were operated using the following input files: <br /> <br />ITEM <br />CRSM control <br />T APEDIT control <br />SMDID demands <br />MHYDRO hydrology control <br />CRSM output from the Cyber <br /> <br />FILE NAME <br />CONCOLl <br />EDSTAT3 <br />ICAP893 <br />PUNC792 & MCMHYD <br />OSEDFX2 <br /> <br />CONCLUSIONS <br /> <br />As shown in Appendix A, end of month storage values are extremely close. Reservoirs in <br />the upper basin, Blue Mesa, Flaming Gorge, Navajo and Lake Powell, are extremely <br />good. Lower Basin reservoirs, Mead, Parker and Mojave, have slightly greater <br />differences but are well within acceptable limits (the maximum difference is 1,300 ac-ft / <br />25,000,000 ac-ft = 0.005 %). Salinity and Power generated estimates are, in all cases, <br />perfect. Power capacity is perfect for all reservoirs except at Parker Dam (Lake Havasu). <br />Note all the results presented in Appendix A - C are in ac-ft, not the kac-ft commonly <br />reported. <br /> <br />11 <br />