Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />.OI'l?"~'!2 <br />lJ..., Jv f <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />15 <br /> <br />5. Project reauthorization include the Mishak National Wild- <br />life Refuge as shown on Plate I I. <br /> <br />6. To replace waterfowl losses approximately 7,000 acres <br />of land, as delineated on Plate I I, be purchased at an <br />estimated cost of $350.000 and together with 2,300 acres <br />of public lands, and 4,500 acres of project land be devel- <br />oped at an estimated cost of $1,358,000 as an integral <br />part of the project and made avai lable to the Secretary <br />of the Interior for waterfowl management in accordance <br />with the terms of a General Plan as provided for in Sec- <br />tion 3 of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (48 Stat. <br />401, as amended; 16 U.S.C. 661 et seq.). <br /> <br />7. A controllable water supply of 8,000 acre-feet consumptive <br />use annually for the Mishak National Wildlife Refuge should <br />be obtained from the well field in lieu of surface water in <br />exchange for well water. <br /> <br />8. The project provide an estimated 5.300 acre-feet of water <br />per annum, to supplement that available on the A1amosa <br />National Wildlife Refuge area, to assure a total supply of <br />14,000 acre-feet per annum for waterfowl management purposes. <br /> <br />9. To avoid damage to the Alamosa National Wildlife Refuge, <br />location and design.of the main conveyance channel within <br />the refuge be planned cooperatively by the Bureau of Sport <br />Fisheries and Wildlife and the Bureau of Reclamation. <br /> <br />It is recognized that final implementation of Recommendations Nos. <br />5,7, and 8 is contingent upon approval by the State of Colorado. <br /> <br />CONCLUS IONS <br /> <br />Construction of the water-salvage project would result in an annu- <br />al increase of 14,500 man-days of stream fishing and 14,000 man- <br />days of lake fishing with annual benefIts of $43,500 and $21,000, <br />respectively. Wildlife losses would be severe. Upland-game losses <br />would amount to 2,600 man-days and waterfowl losses of 1,200 man- <br />days of hunting, together with a loss of production of 12,000 ducks <br />annually. Wildlife-oriented recreation losses of 500 man-days annu- <br />ally also would occur. <br /> <br />