My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06644
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
19000-19999
>
WSPC06644
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:07:03 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 6:00:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.125
Description
Wild and Scenic - Colorado Wilderness Act - 1991
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
3/16/1989
Title
Colorado Wilderness Proposal - Revised Edition
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0)2373 <br /> <br />Resource Information <br /> <br />The principal controversy surrounding the Oh Be Joyful WSA is the <br />possibility of the presence of valuable minerals. Information on <br />mineral existence is contradictory; however, most sources seem to <br />agree upon two facts: 1) there is very little hard data avail- <br />able because of little drilling or other exploration, and 2) <br />there has been no discovery of any large ore bodies, much less any <br />economically recoverable deposits. The Forest Service's Wilder- <br />ness Study Report stated, "The actual mineral value present is <br />unknown because the study area has received only minimal sub- <br />surface exploration.23 <br /> <br />While the Bureau of Mines has found small to medium potential for <br />gold, silver, zinc or lead, the Forest Service document notes that <br />"...the base and precious metals occur in vein-type deposits of <br />relatively small size, making the economic viability of these <br />deposits doubtful." (Later, the document contradicts this by <br />attributing an $8 billion value to Oh Be Joyful minerals. Most of <br />this is based on comparison with the proposed Mt. Emmons mine, <br />which is currently not economically feasible. The Bureau of Mines <br />did not make a mineral survey of the area.)24 <br /> <br />Donald R. Baker, Professor of Geology at Rice University in Texas, <br />has studied the geology of the CresteQ'Butte vicinity since 1968. <br />In his comments on the Forest Service DEIS, he questioned the <br />minimal exploration efforts of mining interests: "...[I]f the <br />private mining interests agree with [the] $8 billion speculation, <br />why have they done so little exploration work in the Study Area? <br />....My opinion is that this represents a mere pittance of techni- <br />cal effort. Perhaps the private mineral interests do not really <br />consider [it] worth significant exploration investment because <br />they do not regard the mineral potential as high as your DEIS <br />suggests,,,25 . <br /> <br />Impacts on Oh Be Joyful's apparent naturalness are slight: an old <br />cabin at the head of the valley (which often shelters day hikers <br />from the daily thunderstorms) is seen only in the immediate <br />vicinity. A 4-wheel drive route runs up the middle of the valley, <br />but its poor condition makes it unusable by vehicles. It is being <br />eroded and obstructed by frequent avalanches. The road has no <br />effect on the natural integrity of the basin, and cannot be seen <br />in most places in the WSA. There are a few hand-dug adits and <br />shafts from old mineral exploration in Peeler and Democrat Basins, <br /> <br />230h Be Joyful Draft EIS, Grand Mesa/Uncompahgre/Gunnison <br />National Forest, June 1981. <br /> <br />24Ibid. <br /> <br />25US Forest Service hearings, July 7, 1981. <br /> <br />21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.