Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT <br /> <br />. FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA <br /> <br />Plaintiff, <br /> <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br />) <br /> <br />Civil Action No. 77-1436 <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., <br /> <br />v. <br /> <br />DOUGLAS M. COSTLE, Administretor, <br />U. S. Environmenta.l Protection Agencyj <br />CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary, <br />U. S. Department of the Interiorj <br />R. KEITH HIGGINSON, Commissioner, <br />Bureau of Reclamation, <br />U. S. Department of the Interior, <br /> <br />Defendants. <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISMISS: <br /> <br />MATTERS CONCERNING THE ROLE OF INTERSTATE COMPACTS <br />OF THE COLORADO RIVER <br />ON THE CLAIMS PRESENTED BY PLAINTIFF <br /> <br />The Defendant-Intervenors Mountain States Legal Found~tion, National <br /> <br />Water Resources Association, Colorado Water Congress, and Yuma Auxiliary Pro- <br /> <br /> <br />ject, hereby submit to this Court the following memorandum on ma'tters pertaining <br /> <br />to the :,ole of interstate compacts in this action. <br /> <br />INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />From the headwaters in Colorado and Wyoming to the M~xican border, the <br /> <br /> <br />waters of the Colorado River now bringing life and prosperity to the semi-arid <br /> <br />West, It was recognized early in the development of the Western states that these <br /> <br />'.'Jaters would have to be conserved and stored to ensure a sufficient water supply <br /> <br />for growing municipalities, industries, and agriculture. The states also sought to <br /> <br />protect their respective rights to divert dnd appropriate the waters (or beneficial <br /> <br />use by their citizens, After many years of litigation and negotiation these goals <br /> <br />",','ere met in part through the 1922 negotiation of the Colorado River Compact, <br /> <br />approved by Congress in the Boulder Canyon Project Act of 1928J 43 U,S.C. 617, and <br /> <br />the Upper Colorado River Basin Compact, approved by Congress in Act of April 6, <br /> <br /> <br />1949, c. 48, 63 Stat. 31. Since the signing of these Com{?acts, water rights have <br /> <br />been created under each state':; B.t:'prcpric.ticn laws, lands heve been purchrlscd, <br /> <br />farml,and brought into production, federal investments made, and towns developed, <br /> <br /> <br />on the proposition that the allocation for beneficial use of the Colorado River was <br /> <br />1435 <br />