Laserfiche WebLink
<br />OOU41l.l <br /> <br /> HYDROLOGIC UNITS IN CATEGORY TOTAL <br /> UNITS <br /> CAT! CAT 2 CAT 3 CAT 4 IN <br />BASIN [degraded] [sustain] [pristine] [lack data] BASIN <br />North Platte 0 0 1 2 3 <br />South Platte 6 1 0 11 18 <br />Republican 1 0 0 10 11 <br />Arkansas 5 0 0 10 15 <br />Cimmarron/Canadian 0 0 0 5 5 <br />Rio Grande 6 0 0 1 7 <br />Colorado 3 1 1 1 6 <br />Gunnison 2 1 1 2 6 <br />Dolores 3 1 0 1 5 <br />GreenlY ampalWhite 2 3 2 2 9 <br />San Juan 3 1 0 4 8 <br />TOTAL 31 8 5 50 94 <br /> <br />Please let me know if you want more analysis or if you want to participate in the public comment <br />process described in the August 7 NRCS memo. This is perhaps another instance where staff could <br />benefit from some guidance on the proper roles for the CWCB in water quality matters. <br /> <br />Attachments: <br />1. August 7, 1998 memo: NRCS to Interested Parties <br />2. February 14, 1997 letter: Browner/Glickman to Gore <br />3. Undated outline EP A overview of CW AP <br />4. Undated map of Colorado hydrologic units, "Draft Unified Watershed Assessment" <br /> <br />cc: Bahman Hatami <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />C'1SllMIll.E!l\WATEJlQ-I\CWAPUWAJ.MIOM <br />pri.lodA"llWI11,ll'II8 <br />