My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06132
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
17000-17999
>
WSPC06132
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:04:38 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 5:42:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River Basin General Publications - Augmentation-Weather Modification
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
3/1/1983
Title
Simulation of the Costs of Removing Snow from County Highways in Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />OOtHH 7 <br /> <br />Cooper et al. (1974:59) claim that snow augmentation would <br />increase removal costs in the Sierra Nevada. They indicate that the <br />amount of the increase, however, would depend on the nature of <br />augmentation. "The adverse effects . . . would be greatly reduced if <br />seeding resulted in increased intensity of snowfall instead of duration" <br />(1974:60). By way of example, they point out that plowing II inches of <br />snow instead of 10 inches would make IlUJCh less difference than operating <br />plows for II hours instead of 10. <br /> <br />tmfortunately, scientists do not know yet if seeding causes storms <br />of greater intensity, or greater duration, or both. Colorado State <br />Uliversity researchers have interpreted findings l:!{ Chappell et al. <br />(1971) to suggest that the main effect of seeding is to extend the <br />perioc1 of precipitation (Mielke et al., 1981:647), but investigation of <br />this important question continues. An answer to it must be found before <br />added costs of snow removal can be determined definitively. <br /> <br />Harris (1981:98), in his assessment of environmental impacts of <br />the Sierra O:loperative pilot Project, states that increased snowpack <br />could affect snow removal in comnunities located more than 6000 feet <br />above sea level. He does not discuss the extent of this effect but <br />indicates that it would depend on the efficiency and adequacy of snow <br />removal operations. <br /> <br />'!he California Department of Transportation reports that "recorded <br />data do not provide us with the refinement necessary to analyze costs <br />involved in snow removal for a small incremental increase in <br />precipitation" (Harris, 1981:99). '!he Department indicates, however, <br />that small increases in snowfall would result in little additional cost, <br />because the men and equipnent used to remove the extra snow are alre,ady <br />necessary for basic winter highway maintenance. The Department also <br />states that wind and ice close roads more often than snow does. <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.