Laserfiche WebLink
<br />i, <br /> <br />, " <br /> <br />-16- <br /> <br />4. Problem: There has been unn~cessary duplication and effort resulting <br /> <br />Options: a. <br /> <br />from the isolation of the Principles and Standards from <br /> <br />the Environmental Impact Statement procedures. <br /> <br />Revise the Principles and Standards to incorporate <br /> <br />all information required for the EIS into project <br /> <br />planning and documentation. <br /> <br />b. Revise the National Environmental Policy Act to <br /> <br />permit reports prepared in accordance with the <br /> <br />Principles and Standards to substitute for EIS <br /> <br />requirements. <br /> <br />5. Problem: The lack of effective project termination procedures <br /> <br />~, <br /> <br />Options <br /> <br />whereby inactive or outdated projects can be reviewed or <br /> <br />dropped by water agencies has frequently led to building <br /> <br />, <br />obsolete projects, to uncertainties as to the support of <br /> <br />local sponsors for the. project, and to unnecessary agency <br /> <br />administrative burdens. <br /> <br />a. <br /> <br />Submit legislation ~hich would result in automatic <br /> <br />termination of inactive projects after a fixed <br /> <br />period of time. <br /> <br />b. Implement procedures in all water resource agencies <br /> <br />which wouln provide for an automatic review of <br /> <br />inactive water projects, and ag2ncy headrecommenda~ion3 <br /> <br />to continue o~ terminate projects, <br />