My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC06079
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
17000-17999
>
WSPC06079
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:04:21 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 5:41:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064.100
Description
Ute Tribes
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Water Division
7
Date
6/1/1987
Author
Boyle Engineering
Title
Agricultural Engineering Study - Mancos Watershed - Task D-E - Final Report - Design-Cost Estimate for Off-Farm Irrigation Facilities and PIA Determination
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
210
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1507 <br /> <br /> <br />the initially identified new PIA parcels would not be sufficient to <br /> <br /> <br />support the additional off-farm cost for storage of water. <br /> <br /> <br />Therefore, the Mancos River was operated in Case III to determine if <br /> <br /> <br />any portion of the new PIA parcels could be supplied from the river <br /> <br /> <br />without storage and without shortages that exceeded the adopted <br /> <br /> <br />acceptable shortage criteria. For the Case III simulations, it was <br /> <br /> <br />assumed that the acres of new PIA lands supplied would be directly <br /> <br /> <br />proportional to the irrigation demand; i.e. 50 percent of the total <br /> <br /> <br />irrigation demand used in Cases I and II, would supply 50 percent of <br /> <br /> <br />the initially identified new PIA lands, etc. The streamflows used <br /> <br /> <br />for the Case III simulations consisted of the virgin flows excluding <br /> <br /> <br />short-term runoff on the l1ancos River near Highway 666 Gage (Point 19 <br /> <br /> <br />on Figure D-ll). The mainstem of the Mancos River was simulated by <br /> <br /> <br />subtracting from the virgin flows: first, the estimated stream <br /> <br /> <br />losses due to phreatophytes for the mainstem above Highway 666; <br /> <br /> <br />second, the average irrigation requirement for the. existing <br /> <br /> <br />irrigated PIA parcels along the mainstem; and third, the estimated <br /> <br /> <br />stream losses due to phreatophytes for the mainstem between Highway <br /> <br /> <br />666 and Aztec Wash. The remaining streamflows were the flows <br /> <br /> <br />available to supply the initially identified new PIA parcels. They <br /> <br /> <br />were subtracted in successive runs from lOO, 75, 50, 25, and 5 percent <br /> <br /> <br />oE the average irrigation requirement for the new lands to determine <br /> <br /> <br />the shortages in supplying those portions of the initially <br /> <br /> <br />identified new PIA. Annual summaries for the five Case III <br /> <br /> <br />simulations are contained in Appendix D.3. Not even 5 percent of the <br /> <br /> <br />new PIA lands can be supplied without exceeding the adopted <br /> <br />32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.