Laserfiche WebLink
<br />QOl5r;~7 <br /> <br />liP <br /> <br />TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />Introduction. <br /> <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />2 <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />II. The 1922 Colorado Compact Plan Was to Equitably Develop <br />the Waters of Each Basin. . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br />III. Lower Basin Federal <br />Compact Depletions. <br /> <br />policies <br /> <br />Have <br /> <br />Secured <br /> <br />Full <br /> <br />1922 <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />IV. <br /> <br />Upper Basin Federal Policies Have <br />River Preservation, Not Development. <br /> <br />Maximized <br /> <br />Colorado <br /> <br />. . ". . . <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />V. <br /> <br />Had There Been No 1922 Compact, Upper Basin Marketing <br />Might Be Law of the River. . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 <br /> <br />( <br /> <br />VI. Water Leasing By Colorado River Tribes Advances New <br />Federal Policies and Current Regional Realities. . 23 <br /> <br />VII. Conclusion. <br /> <br />. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . <br /> <br />30 <br />