My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC05805
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
17000-17999
>
WSPC05805
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:18:36 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 5:30:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.950
Description
Section D General Studies-General Water Studies
State
CO
Date
2/20/1981
Author
DOI
Title
HCRS Rivers Inventory-Final List of Rivers Identified by Mid-Continent Region- Interagency Consultation to Avoid or Mitigate Adverse Effects on Rivers in Nationwide Inventory
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br />. . <br /> <br />. ~ '002 Z 9 7 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />-2- <br /> <br />The effect of all proposed developments within the river corridor ahould <br />be assessed in terms of aeverity of effect and extent of area affected. <br />Developments outside the corridor which would cause visual, Doise, or <br />air quality impacts on the river corridor' should also be examined. <br /> <br />Only proposed Dew construction or proposed expansion of existing develop- <br />ments Deed be considered in assessing impacts. Repair or rehabilitation <br />of existing structures would Dot have a Degative impact except if the <br />action would result in significant expansion of the facility or if the <br />constructionlProcess itself would cause an irreversible impact OD the <br />environment. <br /> <br />Placement of navigation aids such as buoys and channel markers will not <br />be considered as causing adverse effects. <br /> <br />The following are exa~ples of types of developments which would generally <br />require consultation with HeRS because of the potential for adverse <br />effects on the values of a potential wild, scenic, or recreational <br />river. This list is not exhaustive. <br /> <br />'- <br /> <br />Small dock <br />Small bulkhead <br />Clearing and snagging <br />Drainage canal, culvert or <br />outfall <br />Irrigation canal <br />Levee or dike <br />Rip-rap, bank stabilization <br />or erosion control structure <br />Small reservoir <br />Increase in commercial <br />IIlIvigation <br />Dredging or filling <br />lun-of-the-river dam or <br />diversion structure. <br /> <br />. <br />\ <br /> <br />load <br />llallroad <br />Building (any type) <br />Pipeline, transmission <br />line <br />Bridge or ford <br />Cas, 011 or vater well <br />Sub-surface mine opening <br />Quarry <br />Power substation <br />llecreation area <br />Dump or junkyard <br />Change in flow regime <br />Clear-cut timber harvest <br />lladio tower, windmill <br /> <br />The following are examples of types of development which appear most <br />likely to cause serious adverse effects if they are constructed adjacent <br />to or in clo~e prox1mity to an Inventory river. Such development <br />pro~osals will almost always require consultation with HeRS because <br />their effects are likely to conflict with the values of a potential <br />wild, scenic or recreational river. These effects could be severe <br />enough to foreclose designation of the affected river aegment. This <br />list is not exhaustive. <br /> <br />Impoundment <br />Channelization . <br />Instceam or surfAce mining <br />!.oct and clam <br />Airport <br />Landfill <br />Factory <br />Gas or 011 field <br />Hajor h1ghvay <br /> <br />,,:.. <br />,':'::.:' <br />~-~~;~,,'~, . <br /> <br />llallroad yard <br />Power plant <br />Sewage treatment plant <br />Bousing development <br />Shopping center <br />Industrial park <br />Har 1na <br />Commercial clock <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.