My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC05773
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
17000-17999
>
WSPC05773
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:02:53 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 5:29:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064.100
Description
Indian Water Rights Ute Tribes
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
6/1/1987
Author
Boyle Engineering
Title
Agricultural Engineering Study Southern Ute and Ute Mountain Ute Indian Reservations San Juan Watershed Final Report
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />1276 <br /> <br /> <br />Off-farm irrigation transmission facilities <br /> <br /> <br />designed for those !;larcels with !;lreliminary <br /> <br /> <br />greater than the off- farm water !;lum!;ling costs. <br /> <br /> <br />re-evaluated, added to the facilities cost, <br /> <br /> <br />preliminary payment capacity. <br /> <br />were conce!;ltually <br /> <br />payment ca!;lacities <br />The !;lumping cost was <br />and com!;lared to the <br /> <br />To complete the PI A anal ysi s, the cropping !;la t tern and paymen t <br />capacities were reviewed by the economist taking into account the <br />practicality of the cropping pattern for the particular parcel and <br />any agronomic costs that might be particular to the parcel. Several <br />iterations of this process between the economist and the engineer <br />were sometimes necessary in order to develop the most economical <br /> <br /> <br />parcel and facilities layout. Those parcels that still exhibited <br /> <br /> <br />positive residual payment ca!;lacity after these further analyses were <br /> <br /> <br />then determined to be practicably irrigable. <br /> <br />0.2 SELECTION OF PARCELS FOR OFF-FARM DESIGN <br /> <br /> <br />Parcels to be considered for PIA analysis were identified in the Task <br /> <br /> <br />B Report along with on-farm irrigation costs. The Task B re!;lort <br /> <br /> <br />identified irrigation costs for handmove sprinkler, sideroll <br /> <br /> <br />sprinkler, gravity (furrow or basin), center pivot, and center pivot <br /> <br /> <br />with s!;lrinkler in the corners. computer tabulation com!;lared on- <br /> <br /> <br />farm irrigation costs to the crop !;layment capacity for an <br /> <br /> <br />alfalfa/barley crop rotation. <br /> <br />The first step in making this task analysis was determination of the <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.