My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC05442
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
18000-18999
>
WSPC05442
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 12:01:05 PM
Creation date
10/9/2006 5:13:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8541
Description
San Luis Valley Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
6/26/1972
Author
Felix L Sparks
Title
San Luis Valley Project Closed Basin Division - 1972-1974 - Statement, Felix L Sparks before the Subcommittee on Water and Power Resources, Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs S. 520, DC
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />t, <br />OOOlx23 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />under interstate compact. <br />The required delivery from Colorado under the terms of the <br /> <br />Rio Grande Compact was based in part upon the requirements of the <br /> <br /> <br />Mexican Treaty. It was always recognized that Elephant Butte Dam <br /> <br /> <br />would have to rely to a large extent on waters released from the <br /> <br /> <br />State of Colorado. We do not object to the storage of water in the <br /> <br /> <br />Elephant Butte Reservoir for release to the Republic of Mexico, but <br /> <br />we do object to any implication that this national obligation should <br />be transferred to the State of Colorado. <br /> <br />It is most obvious that the Mexican Treaty obligation <br /> <br /> <br />imposes a delivery requirement of 60,000 acre-feet annually from the <br /> <br /> <br />Rio Grande River. The major part of this burden falls upon the <br /> <br /> <br />State of Colorado, Where the principal flows of the upper river <br /> <br /> <br />originate. I repeat again that this is a burden which was assumed <br /> <br /> <br />as a national obligation and not one which the State of Colorado <br /> <br /> <br />assumed by voluntary interstate compact. We believe that simple <br /> <br /> <br />equity demands that this national obligation be fulfilled at national <br /> <br /> <br />expense. Both New Mexico and Texas have received substantial assist- <br /> <br /> <br />ance in connection with the national obligations assumed by the <br /> <br /> <br />treaties of both 1906 and 1944. On the other hand. the State of <br /> <br /> <br />Colorado, upon which the principal burden of the 1906 treaty falls, <br /> <br />has received no assistance. <br /> <br />The legislation provides that, after the satisfaction of <br /> <br />-11- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.