Laserfiche WebLink
<br />a. <br /> <br />-38- <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />NOTES - CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />Arizona v. California <br /> <br /> <br />Note that these numbers may increase when boundaries <br /> <br /> <br />for these reservations are finalized. The Chemehuevi <br /> <br />Reservation boundary is not being challenged and the <br /> <br />water right associated therewith is final. <br /> <br />Note also that the numbers contained in the "Potential <br />Irrigable Acres" column are, in this instance, <br />"practically irrigable acres" as that term has been <br />judicially defined. <br /> <br />b. <br /> <br />Information from unpublished tabulation entitled <br />"Indian Irrigation Projects Presently Included in the <br />BIA Irrigation Construction Program - October 1975," <br />compiled by the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Copy pro- <br />vided to Western States Water Council by the Depart- <br />ment of Interior's Office of Water Policy. <br /> <br />c, <br /> <br />Id. Footnote 27 to the document states: "A proposed <br />action being considered by the Federal Power Commission <br />regarding the use of the water of the San Luis Rey <br />River in Southern California could result in con- <br />siderable expansion of irrigation facilities of the <br />La Jolla, San Pasqual, Pauma, and Pala Reservations. <br />