My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC05386
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
18000-18999
>
WSPC05386
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 11:11:03 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 5:11:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8044
Description
Section "D" General Studies - Compacts - General Writings
State
NE
Date
2/16/1951
Author
Royce J Tipton
Title
Interstate Water Compacts - Interstate Water Compacts and their Relationship to Basin Development
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />" <br /> <br />llOG3~H <br />project has been authorized and work on it is proceeding. <br />the project are indicated on Exhibit No.2. <br /> <br />The various features of <br /> <br />None of this important river basin work in the upper Rio Grande could <br />have been accomplished vdthout the Rio Grande Compact. The commissioners of that <br />Compact Commission have worked harmoniously together in the administration of the <br />compact since it Vlent into effect, and are also working harmoniously with govern- <br />mental agencies in devising logical plans for the solution of the water use problems <br />within the basin. <br /> <br />Water use nroblems concerning the Pecos River developed between Texas <br />and New Mexico in the early 1920's. A compact was negotiated in 1925. It was <br />"tified by the legislatures of the two states but the New Mexico ratification was <br />';stoed by the Governor of that State. Texas then repealed its ratification and the <br />compact never became effective. Tension bet,veen the two states became greater as <br />the water use problems became more critical. McMillan reservoir, the main reservoir <br />~'~::" the Carls bad Project in New !lexico, was gradually losing its capacity because of <br />sedimentation. Salt cedars had taken root over a large area of the delta created by <br />the sedimentation at the head of Lake McMillan, and were beginning to talee a large <br />toll of the already short water supply. The quality of water was not good, becoming <br />progressively worse downstream. The City of Hoswell in New ]"Iexico needed flood con- <br />trol protective works; the old Fort Sumner project in New Mexico required rehabilita- <br />',ion because of damage to its system by flood flons; the Carlsbad Project required <br />replacement storage; and the irrigated area in Texas required supplemental storage. <br /> <br />Alamogordo reservoir was constructed to provide replacement storage for <br />the Carlsbad Project, the authorization act having been permitted to pass in Congress <br />u::der what was known as a gentleman's agreement between certain members of the Texas <br />and New Mexico delegations and the Secretary of the Interior. Red Bluff reservoir <br />was constructed in Texas at about the same time to provide supplemental water <br />supplies and to generate hydroelectric,energy. These ~rojects, however, did not <br />solve the interstate problems and the tension between the two states continued to in- <br />crease. <br /> <br />Claims were made practically every year by Texas interests that the <br />Secretary of the Interior was not adhering to the gentleman's agreement in the opera- <br />tion of Alamogordo reservoir. Bills were introduced in Congress to provide needed <br />flood control for Roswell and the rehabilitation of the Fort Sumne~ project, but it <br />was impossible to secure passage of these authorization bills because of opposition <br />by Texas. <br /> <br />Compact negotiations were resumed and a compact was finally consummated <br />which became effective in 1949. Tension between the states was relieved immediately. <br />Since the compact became effective the states have been working closely together to <br />make the best use possible of the extremely limited and poor water supply. <br /> <br />At present the Pecos River Commission, working in cooperation ,vith <br />relevant governmental agencies, is making studies to determine how the non-beneficial <br />use of water on the stream can be reduced, and hoVl the salinity problem can be <br />alleviated. Studies are also being made of a reservoir which '{QuId provide flood <br />control and replace Alamogordo reservoir as a conservation reservoir. The liaison <br />between the Commission and the governmental agencies at the technical level is <br />through the Engineering Advisory Committee to the Commission. ' <br /> <br />Congress has authorized the rehabilitation of the Fort Sumner Project in <br />New Mexico and the work is practically complete. The authorizing legislation had the <br />support of the Texas congressional delegation. <br /> <br />-7- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.