My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC05386
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
18000-18999
>
WSPC05386
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 11:11:03 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 5:11:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8044
Description
Section "D" General Studies - Compacts - General Writings
State
NE
Date
2/16/1951
Author
Royce J Tipton
Title
Interstate Water Compacts - Interstate Water Compacts and their Relationship to Basin Development
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.\ <br /> <br />000397 <br /> <br />the Missouri River basin plan, which is located on a tributary of the Yellowstone <br />and on which pre-construction work had started, is being held in abeyance pending <br />the outcome of the effectuation of the compact. <br /> <br />A treaty exists between the United states and Canada with respect to r <br />tn~ St: Ma~y and Milk Rivers; Tbi5 treaty ~a5 ne~ess~ry i~ nrnAr that certain <br />works might be constructed to provide a supplemental water supply for the Milk <br />River Project which is located in the United States. The principle of equitable <br />apportionment and beneficial use is illustrated by the following ?ortion of Articl~ <br />VI of the treaty: <br /> <br />".....the St. Mary and Milk Rivers and their tributaries <br />(in the State of Montana and the Provinces of Alberta <br />and Saskatchewan) are to be treated as one stream for <br />the pur,lose of irrigation and power, ,and the waters <br />thereof shull be apportioned equally betv;een the two <br />countries, but in making such equal apportionment more <br />than half may be taken from one river and less than <br />half from the other by either country so as to afford <br />a more beneficial use to each." <br /> <br />I should like now to describe the international situation between the <br />Uni ted States and Ilexico which has developed on the lower Rio Grande on the Colo- <br />rado River, and 01. the Tiajuana River. Beginning in the early 1900's irrigation <br />of lower Rio Grande lands in the vicinity of Brownsville, Texas, started and pro- <br />ceeded at a rapid rate. At the present time some 600,000 acres of lRnd are irri- <br />~ated in that area. T~is is a very rich agricultural area, the principal crops <br />being citrus fruits and winter vegetables. I'exico began a corresponding develop- <br />ment at a considerably later date. Because of the topography of the area, and be- <br />cause there was no treaty between the United States and Mexico to permit the con- <br />struction of diversion dams, all the water used on the United States side had to be <br />pumped, and now is being pumped, from the river. On the other hand, the land on <br />the Mexican side slopes away from the river in such a way that gravity diversions <br />can be made without diversion structures. <br /> <br />The Retamal Heading was constructed by IIexico in the 1930' s. This <br />heading is located above approximately t'.Jo-thirds of the pump headings in the <br />United States. Clearing of lands in ;,iexico proceeded at a rapid raGe. In the <br />meantime, what is now known as the Illarte Gomez dam was constructed near the mouth <br />of the San Juan River, one of the principal Mexican tributaries of the lower Rio <br />Grande. No outlet was provided from the storage dam. The development of lands <br />under the San Juan project proceeded at a rapid rate. There developed a real <br />threat to the water supplies which had been used by United States interests for <br />some years. <br /> <br />Efforts to negotiate a treaty over the waters of the Rio Grande and the <br />Colorado were initiated in 1923 and abandoned in 1928. In face of the impending <br />danger, the United States Section of what was then the International Boundary Com- <br />mission conceived what was known as Federal Project No.5, which was authorized by <br />the Congress for construction in 1941. It consisted of an extremely long canal to <br />divert water from the Rio Grande on.the United States side and carry it to an off- <br />channel reservoir from which water would be released through a power plant into <br />another long channel, thence into a terminal reservoir. From the terminal reser- <br />voir, water would be released into a gravity canal to serve all of the United Stams <br />lands by gravity. The purpose of the project was to convert from an international <br />status to a domestic status those waters which were being used, and had been used <br />for sometime, by Texas irrigators. <br /> <br />-10- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.