Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- 'OQtJll53 <br /> <br />I. <br /> <br />II. <br /> <br />III <br /> <br />CRDSS Meeting AGENDA <br /> <br />WATER RESOURCE PLANNING MODEL <br />STATE MOD vs. MODS 1M <br />3:00 p.m., February 22, ]995 <br /> <br />"Recommendations for CROSS Water Resource Planning Model" Memo <br />Discussion <br /> <br />RTi Position <br />John Eckhardt (new task leader) <br />Markus <br />premature for decision on efficiency <br />Technical Subcommittee Comments (Non-CRDSS Team) <br />Jon Altenhofen (NCWCD) <br />- Older MODS 1M works for them <br />- ability to use most important criteria <br />- Understands problems - seems like comprehensive state test <br />- what is Labadie response <br />- supports recommendations <br />Marie Del Toro (Colo. Springs, Southeast) <br />- Older MODSIM worked for them through consultant <br />- Always uncomfortable with Labadie <br />- Agrees with recommendation <br />Jim Heaney (CU) <br />- Supports recommendation <br />- does not favor model with more capabilites than presently need. <br />Alan Leak (Arapahoe County) <br />- questioned political motivation <br />- why not use GUNMOD? <br />- have to rely on State people - supports recommendation <br />Mike Lewellen (DWD) <br />- Favor ST A TEMOD because of DWB experience with similar tool <br />- More opportunities for data sharing. <br />Dave Merritt (CRCWD) <br />- always concerned about MODS 1M <br />- can we get Boyle involved? <br />- Why not GUNMOD? <br />- Supports change <br />Jim Slattery (Boyle) <br />- Comment- Concern over RTi learning curve <br />- Boyle developing own GUI for BESTSM <br />- Hard time believing respective time invo]vment for models <br />- fully supportive of recommendation <br /> <br />p...\) <br />c:bL <br />G-lL\.\ <br />(,,~ <br />~)t\ <br />0-u,-/:> <br />~~S <br /> <br />'y- <br /> <br />)'1/ .~ <br /><'i<-"'> <br />< -e' !p",,~ <br />,,:J ~ ~~' <br />'\:f '" )(~ <br />~~ c:."- <br />X. oJ . <br />~ <br />