Laserfiche WebLink
<br />002774 <br /> <br />Development of Middle Green River razorback sucker brood stock at Ouray during FY 1997 will be <br />limited to no more than 6-8 family lots, due to the lack of intensive culture facilities and limited pond <br />space (Pruitt 1996b). An excessive demand is being placed on the facilities at Ouray due to <br />contribution offish from various Recovery Program areas (pruitt 1996a). This continuous demand <br />on space has resulted in caring for more fish than the facility, at its current capacity, can handle. Fish <br />held at too high a density are more vulnerable when exposed to pathogens (Biology Committee <br />1996). Losses due to disease and stress can be expected. With the decision not to build a rearing <br />facility at Craig, Colorado, the need for a backup refugia still exists and would alleviate some of the <br />space requirements at Ouray. Facilities at Wahweap SFH are likely to serve as the backup refuge for <br />the Middle Green razorback sucker. <br /> <br />Colorado River Presumotive Stock: Between 1990 and 1994, adult razorback sucker from Upper <br />Colorado River, Etter Pond in the Upper Colorado River, Colorado River ann of Lake Powell, and <br />San Juan River ann of Lake Powell were captured and placed in ponds at Horsethief State Wildlife <br />Area for development of broodstock There are too few fish remaining in the wild to develop a <br />broodstock from the Upper Colorado River presumptive stock (Czapla 1997). The consensus of the <br />Genetics Panel and Upper Basin biologists during a meeting held on the razorback sucker in <br />September, 1994 was that the broodstock should be developed from a mixed stock (Wydoski 1994b). <br /> <br />Starting in 1994, due to the numbers of adult razorback, a spawning matrix was constructed <br />consisting of 10 females and 13 males, five of which consisted of first generation male progeny from <br />the.San Juan River Arm of Lake PowelL A total of34 family lots were spawned in 1994, 1995, and <br />1996 using this matrix with a current population of approximately 200 fish per lot. Only 8 females <br />and 11 males included in this original brood stock matrix are still alive (Baker 1996). Development <br />efforts during FY 1997 will be directed towards continuing the development of the razorback <br />spawning matrix with the remaining adult broodstock and with wild adult razorback suckers collected <br />from the Upper Colorado River, Etter Pond, Colorado River Ann of Lake Powell, and San Juan <br />River Ann of Lake PowelL <br /> <br />3.2,3 Refuge Needs for Upper Colorado River Basin <br /> <br />Propagation facility needs can be separated into three major categories: primary refuges, backup <br />refuges, and growout ponds (Wydoski 1995b). A description of each category, as outlined by Czapla <br />(1997), is discussed below. <br /> <br />Primary Re~'les: Primary refuges are intended for developing and maintaining brood stocks and for <br />production of endangered fish for priority research experiments. The propagation facilities at these <br />refuges should be able to rear pedigreed family lots of fish. Two primary refuges have been proposed <br />for brood stock development. For all four endangered species, Ouray EFCES will be used for Green <br />River stocks and the Grand Valley Endangered Fish Facility (Hatchery Building and Horsethief State <br />Wildlife Area ponds) will be used for Upper Colorado River stocks. In 1997, Wahweap State Fish <br />Hatchery in Utah may be designated as a primary refuge for the development ofbonytail broodstock <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin. <br /> <br />14 <br />