Laserfiche WebLink
<br />0027;)4 <br /> <br />No time frames for completion of these activities were specified in the recovery plan for the Colorado <br />squawfish. <br /> <br />No specific areas for stocking of Colorado squawfish were identified in the recovery plan. However, <br />in March, 1994, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service designated 912 river miles within the Upper <br />Colorado River Basin as critical habitat for the Colorado squawfish (Federal Register Vol. 59, No. <br />54, March 21, 1994 pgs. 13374-400). The designated critical habitat included the following reaches: <br /> <br />1. Yampa River - from Craig, Colorado to confluence with the Green River (131 miles), <br />2. Green River - from confluence with the Yampa River to confluence with the Colorado <br />River (333 miles), <br />3. White River - from Rio Blanco Reservoir to the confluence with the Green River (125 <br />miles), <br />4. Gunnison River - from confluence with the Uncompaghre River to confluence with the <br />Colorado River (60 miles), <br />5. Colorado River - from Rifle, Colorado to Lake Powell (263 miles). <br /> <br />2.2.2 Bony tail Chub <br /> <br />The original recovery plan for the bonytail chub was finalized in May, 1984 (U.S. Fish and Wildlife <br />1984a). Revisions were made in September, 1990 which reflect the establishment of the Recovery <br />Program (US. Fish and Wildlife Service 1990a). The revised recovery plan identified a short-term <br />goal of preventing the extinction of the species due to their severely declining numbers. In the long- <br />term, once the immediate threat of extinction was removed, the revised recovery plan listed four <br />major actions that were needed to secure the survival of the bonytail chub. Three of the four major <br />actions were directly related to stocking and genetics management and included (1) prevent extinction <br />of the bonytail chub by establishing a genetically diverse captive population for use in efforts to <br />reintroduce the fish into the wild, (2) reintroduce hatchery-reared bonytail chub into the wild, and (3) <br />resolve taxonomic problems in Colorado River basin chubs, i.e., the bonytail, humpback, and <br />roundtail (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1990a). The revised recovery plan called for the actions <br />described below.. <br /> <br />1. Prevent extinction of bonytail chub in the wild. The bony tail chub is presently the most <br />endangered fish species in the Colorado River Basin, Although individuals are still <br />occasionally captured and captive stocks are being maintained, there is no evidence that any <br />self-sustaining populations exist. Therefore, immediate action is required to prevent its <br />extinction and maintain its gene pool. The following actions are considered priority actions: <br />. Protect in Refugia. Studies indicate that the few bony tail chub existing in the wild are <br />old fish which apparently are not reproducing. In time, these fish will be lost to <br />mortality. Therefore, genetic evaluation of captive bony tail chub should be conducted <br />to determine if obtaining wild bony tail would be required for future reintroduction <br />efforts. If so, wild fish should be obtained and placed in refugiafor protection. <br />. Establish and maintain refugia in at least two locations. A refugiumfor bony tail <br />chub currently exists at Dexter National Fish Hatchery, New Mexico, and should be <br />maintained One or more additional refugia should be established and maintained <br /> <br />4 <br />