WSPC05015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~' , 01)2082 -. ~-- ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENC\: RATING SYSTEM FOR EIS REVIEWS EU-ENVIRONMENTALLY UNSATISFACTORY The EPA review has identified adverse environmen-- tal impacts that are of sufficient magnitude that they , are unsatisfactory from the standpoint of public , health or welfare or environmental quality. , EO-ENVIRONMENTAL OBJECTIONS The EPA review has identified significant en- . vironmental impacts that must be avoided in order i to provide adequate protection for the environment. I . , EC-ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS , The EPA review has identified . en- , vironmental impacts that must be avoided in order I to provide adequate protection for t~e envirqnment. LO-LACK OF OBJECTIONS The EPA review has not identified any potential en- vironmental impacts requiring substantive changes to the proposal. I 3- CATEGORY 3-INADEQUATE , EPA does not believe that the draft EIS adequately assesses potentially significant environmental im- pacts of the action, EPA does not believe that the draft EIS is adequate for the purposes of the NEPA and/or Section 309 review, and thus should be formally revised and made available for public comment in a supplemental or revised draft EIS. ! CATEGORY 2-INSUFFICIENT INFORMATION : The draft EIS does not contain sufficient information I for EPA to fully assess environmental impacts that I should be avoided in order to fully protect the en- , J vironment, or the EPA reviewer has identified new I reasonably available alternatives that are within the ,I spectrum of alternatives analyzed in the draft EIS, which could reduce the environmental impacts of the action. CATEGORY 1-ADEQUATE EPA believes the draft EIS adequately sets forth the environmental impa ct(s) of the preferred alternative' and those of the alternatives reasonably available to the proj,3ct or action. , , l.l. ,W"