My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC04953
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
18000-18999
>
WSPC04953
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:41:39 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:56:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8272
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Program - CRBSCP
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
4/1/1990
Author
Joseph F Friedkin
Title
International Problem with Mexico Over the Salinity of the Lower Colorado River - Excerpted from Water and the American West - Essays in Honor of Raphael J Moses
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />tl"." ':: '- 0 <br />uui:",~ <br /> <br />Salinity oj the' Lower Colorado River /33 <br /> <br />vote on the treaty. The other five basin states agreed with the <br />proposed treaty and joined with Texas in July, 1944, in sup- <br />porting its ratification. <br />Reading between the lines of the record, it seems clear that <br />United States proponents of the treaty felt that to insist on an <br />express provision denying the right of Mexico to water quality <br />would risk there being no treaty, and would result in a lengthy <br />adjudication of the issue by arbitration or before an inter- <br />national tribunal. They felt that the treaty as written would <br />seIVe the best interest of the United States by limiting Mexico's <br />claim to Colorado River waters as soon as possible, since <br />Mexican uses from the Colorado River (and the Rio Grande) <br />were rapidly expanding. <br />The Mexican negotiators did not insist upon a water qual- <br />. ity provision either, because they thought that the treaty as <br />written would protect their rights and that the United States <br />would act in good faith in carrying out the purpose of the treaty <br />that was stated in the preamble: "to fix and delimit the rights of <br />the two countries with respect to the waters of the Colorado and <br />T~uana River. . . in order to obtain the most complete and sat. <br />isfactory utilization thereof. . . ." The Mexican authorities also <br />felt that their interests would be seIVed by reaching an <br />agreement soon, before the United States further increased its <br />uses of waters of the Colorado and the Rio Grande rivers. <br />From my talks with RJ. Tipton, one of the principal <br />United States negotiators, it seems abundantly clear that none <br />of the negotiators in either country anticipated that return <br />flows with salinity as high as 6,000 ppm would ever be deliv- <br />ered to Mexico as part of its treaty allotment of Colorado River <br />waters. The salinity of the return flows was far in excess of that <br />ordinarily required for successful operation of irrigation pro- <br />jects. <br /> <br />Mexico's Water Use <br />Mexico uses the treaty waters it receives to irrigate about <br />300,000 acres in the delta of the Colorado River, in the Mexi- <br />cali and San Luis Valleys. The waters are applied mostly in <br />areas of clay soils. The Mexicali and San Luis Valleys, includ- <br />ing the city of Mexicali, had a population of about 400,000 in <br />1961. The area remains one of the most productive and <br />prosperous agricultural areas in Mexico. Mexicali is the state <br />capital of Baja California and has long been politically <br />important in the Mexican government. <br /> <br />The First Presidential Directives <br />Mexico's formal protest in November, 1961, led United <br />States President John F. Kennedy and Mexico's President <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.