My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC04884
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
18000-18999
>
WSPC04884
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:41:24 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:54:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
7630.650
Description
Wild and Scenic - Yampa River
State
CO
Basin
Statewide
Date
10/8/1979
Title
Comments of Colorado River Water Conservation District - RE-Draft Study-EIS - Green and Yampa Rivers - Prepared by National Park Service
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />001361 <br /> <br />of the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Draft documents, <br />nonetheless, expressed unsubstantiated biological opinions <br /> <br /> <br />on the consequences of upstream development on habitat <br /> <br /> <br />requirements of allegedly endangered fishes. Since the Fish <br /> <br /> <br />and Wildlife Service acknowledges the habitat requirements <br /> <br /> <br />of such fishes to be largely unknown, and, since, legitimate <br /> <br /> <br />scientific differences exist as to the best ways and means <br /> <br /> <br />of accomodating the requirements of the fishes. public <br /> <br /> <br />comment and input should be material to any discussion of <br /> <br /> <br />the subject in any Final documents. The official prohibition <br /> <br /> <br />on such dialog effectively stultified the objective of <br /> <br /> <br />public input. and results, as before, in a total loss of <br /> <br /> <br />reliability in the Draft reports. <br /> <br /> <br />(3) The Board of the River District further presumes <br /> <br /> <br />the Congressional directive to the Secretary of the Interior <br /> <br /> <br />(the Secretary's duties as to the instant studies were <br /> <br /> <br />apparently delegated first to BOR, and. later, to NPS) <br /> <br /> <br />requires an objective study and report on the merits and the <br /> <br /> <br />demerits of the proposals. Even a cursory examination of <br /> <br /> <br />the Draft documents results in the conviction the study was <br /> <br /> <br />wholly subjective, rather than objective. and has. as its <br /> <br /> <br />principal objective, the foreclosure of upstream development <br /> <br /> <br />on the Yampa River wi.thou.t regard to the consequences to the <br /> <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.