Laserfiche WebLink
<br />to repeal the State Act was dropped.) A compromise bill, that among other <br />provisions, eliminated the requirement for management plans and redefines the <br />protected corridors to apply to lands immediately adjacent to the rivers <br />rather than whole watersheds, passed the Assembly in June. <br /> <br />CONTACT: James II. Burns, Asst. Secretary <br />California Resources Agency <br />1416 Ninth Street <br />Room 1311 <br />Sacremento, CA 95814 <br />(916) 445-3758 <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />BIBLIOGRAPHY: <br /> <br />1. California lnld & Scenic Rivers Act, Chapter 1.4, Public Resources Code, <br />1972,pp.6, <br /> <br />2, California State liild & Scenic Rivers Summary, Ilaterway Nanagement Planning <br />Program, Department of Fish and Game, 1980,pp.5. <br /> <br />3. California Haterway Management Plans, Preparation and Appropriations, <br />Chapter 761 of Laws of 1971,pp.7. <br /> <br />4. Lower American River Haterway Management Plan, Department of Fish and Game, <br />July, 1977,pp,46. <br /> <br />5. North Fork American River llaterway Hanagement Plan, Department of Fish and <br />Game, July, 1977, pp.120. <br /> <br />6. Salmon River \'Iaterway Management Plan, Department of Fish and Game, June, <br />1980, pp.72. <br /> <br />7. Scott River \laterway Ilanagement Plan, Department of Fish and Game, June, <br />1980, pp .120. <br /> <br />6 <br />