Laserfiche WebLink
<br />uu2~J~r. <br /> <br />100:; <br />E <br /> <br />".J <br /> <br />- <br />Z- <br />_Z <br />~8 <br />Ow <br />." <br />~. <br />D'" <br />,,~ <br />-'" <br />O. <br />Ww <br />>- <br />-W <br />-- <br />U~ <br />wU <br />W- <br />W" <br />W" <br />" <br /> <br />. <br />. <br /> <br />,;/01 <br />/i <br />/: <br />/7 <br /> <br />lei ~ <br />~ <br /> <br /> <br />" <br />BANI<8JU OISCI'iAAGE. IN <br />:;UeIC METERS pE~ SECOI\~ <br /> <br />Fig. '. ComparlSCr. of effectl'e disch.arre lj1d bankfull dls~b~r!:e. <br /> <br />of a Ic.1:t was evaluated by varyUlg the water surface <br />slope by -= 10 peru:nt. This test abo is equivalc:o.t to 3. :t <br />10 per:ent change in the flo.... depth and a:.edian bed;- <br />materi.31 panlc:le size. Uncenainty in the reach bydr:u1li, <br />c!J.ara::teristics bas a ..ery signific.anl effect. is large 4.S :t <br />300 pertent 0::1 the compu:ed mean an.:I\J,lJ bed-m:a.tcnal <br />load. bm only a very small effcct OD the effecti"'e discharge <br />or n.::1ge of dominant t;.ed-rnatenal ttansponing di~h3:gc. <br />The con:?uted effecti'o.e discharge is 9.09 m'/sec usmg a 10 <br />percent increase 11\ water surfacc slope 3lld 9.66 m'/sec <br />using a 10 pcrc.cnt de:::rease in waler Sw10iCe slope <br />compared to 9.94 cr/see ~ shown In Figure 3d. <br />As described above. the dominant bed-material cranspon- <br />i:lg di~arges.. i.e. those discharges that transpott the <br />ccntr.aJ. 80 pelU'nt portiOD of the me;m-annual bed.m.atui.al <br />lo3d. 0CCt0r about 15 days per year Oll average. There is. <br />however. substantial yeou~(o-year variuion in the dun:lCll <br />of bed-ma:eri.1l t~poniDg di~lwges and. colTespond~ <br />ingly. the qu.:mtity of bed material transponed. Ye.a.n <br />havi.ng rel3.lin'l'y large f\lDof( t)'Pic:l1ly Yo'in have t:W'Iy <br />more than the average number of days with discharge Ul <br />the range of dom.i..c.a.ot berl.material tnnsportillg flo.....s. <br />Conveoely. relati"vdy sca1l rt:.Iloff ).e.us frequenrly Will <br />ha'lle feo;'lo. or no days of do:niD.a.ot f)ed-lm.terial transponmg <br />disct:arge. Tbe 3CCUDl1Jlattve distributton of days over the <br />period of record wben flow occulTed .....ithin the range of <br />dotni.n;mt bed-matenaJ U'aIlSpOnlDg dischuie:S are shown <br /> <br />010 d <br /> <br />0991 S6r 0.6 ~3l <br /> <br />A~OREWS ASD ~ASKERvtS 159 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />for the six pgi.t:g s~atio:,.s .....tth tr.e lor.gesl penods of <br />record ir. Fij;Cre 5a.f. The abscissa ..3..iues Wert co:r.pu:ed <br />~y ordenng the a."\1';ual runoff from s:r.allesl to largest and <br />divided by the lengtl'1 of record. The: CrdlI1ale 'IIalutS were <br />.:ompu:ed by sum.~ng to'le nucber o! days of dotIUn.1I1r <br />bed-I:IJ.tenal nanspoJu:g lils.:Orge troI:". t.ie: smallest 10 the <br />largest annu:ll IU:loff yeus ar.d divided b)' the total ;J'.:.mber <br />of days me: dOtIllf'.3L1 disorge OCC'.J1Tcd. <br />Appro~un.ately .so percent of all days when tbe cail)' <br />a:.ean :10..... .....as WIthin the range of dO::ll:l.Z.Ot bed-material <br />tr3.:l.5"pomng disc~arges occur l..C. abou: 20 percel:U of the <br />)'e.'lTs. Conversely. dOlDmant bed-tr.,ateriaJ tr31lSponing <br />dis,b.arges did nOI oc:cu: dunog approxHnalely one.third of <br />the years. Those years .....ben dorrun.ant bed.ma:erial <br />transponing discl-.1fges cx;::UlTed 00 a relatively large <br />llumbcr of days .....ere. ",i!.h rare u:ception, ).e1rS during <br />whicb Jnnual runoff sigoific.a.ouy e~~ded the IODg-term <br />mean. For ex.a.mple. Cie Ii largest n;noff years f'tcoreed <br />at the ~idd.le Boulder Cruk at ~ederl3.Ild ga,e. 20 percenl <br />of the period of record. ha~ 57 percetlt of all days with <br />djsdla.rges within tJ:.e ral'1ge of c!orn.i:J.ant bed-n::aterial <br />nansporti.og flows. Funhennore. 51 perce::1t of all bed <br />material tra.n5poned during the period of record. 1908- <br />1993. OCCl:r i.:J. the 17 l31gest IUIloff ye.:m. <br />Finally. an a.dditio::ul faC40r complic3.tes a simple <br />description of the occurn-ncc of :he dominant bed-material <br />transpottiDg discharges. In wose years .....ith se"'eral cl.ays of <br />dorninmt dise.ha:ge. the penod of significant bed.material <br />trmspon is freq'Jently brokeD into two. three. and. <br />sometirr.es, four segma:u of a few days tach and <br />occurring. over a period of 3040 days. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />: <br /> <br />" <br />l <br />J <br /> <br />'oc <br /> <br />S. CHANSEL M.o\..I:"roiESA......CE FLOWS <br /> <br />The preceding analysis has idc:o.tified the malJ\itude ;md <br />frequency of dlschuEcs ....hich uan.spon most of the bed- <br />ma.teria11oad over a period of years in gravel.bed rivers <br />common throughOUt the westnn United States. These <br />disChar~S b.a~rel.aJ.iVeIY o.1!TOW nnge, bttWee::l ol.a:iDd. <br />\...~tim...s.\..lh~.bWfllll discb3I'tC~tnr\m2!~~ <br />15 dayS P;U~,uYl:t2&'" Furthermore. the b.anifWI <br />disehuge of the nvers studied lies 'oI,..ithi.o the range of <br />domin:wt bed-material tra..zpon discharges and is very <br />nearly equal to the iDterval of disebarge whieb transpOrtS <br />!.he largest portion of tte loog-term bed-material load. <br />Therdore. i: is concluded that the dimensLol1S. morphol- <br />ogy. and otber physieaJ characteristics of these gra\'el-bcd <br />rivers are priJ:rWily delerm:.ned by a well-defined. <br />relauvely narrow r111ge of disch.a:ges. Tbese rcsulu <br />establish. the b3Sl5 for formwaung a regime of streamflows <br /> <br />3JI^H35 l53HOd ;051 <br /> <br />,roll 101~1.6o.l- m <br />