<br />O(J2094
<br />
<br />]56 EFFECTIVE DISCHARGE AND CHAKNEL-MAINTEI'Aj\;CE FLOWS
<br />
<br />where W'i = [q" (-,'" - 1)] I ffi gl." (RS)"'], <p, = T," / T'i"
<br />q" is the volu=etric bedload transpon rate of the i>
<br />panicle fraction per unit width of channel, f, is the percent
<br />of bed particles in the i~ fraction, and g is lhe acceleration
<br />of gravity.
<br />An essential aspect of this approach was the development
<br />of a refereDce dimensionless shear stress. TUtJ. such that 1:rl
<br />= f (d/d",) where d, is the diameter of particles of the I"'
<br />siu fraclion of bed material and d" is the median p:ll'licle
<br />diameter of bed materia!. Parker er al. [1982J found that
<br />the Use of <P,. rather than T, . resulted in a similanry
<br />collapse, so that W', is approximately a single valued
<br />function of cili. The Parker bedload function for the domain
<br /><l>i > 1.65 was derived by tining cili and W', to the Einstein
<br />bedload function. For the domain 0.95 < <1>, < 1.65, the
<br />Parker bedload function was derived from bedload
<br />transpon rales measured in Oak Creek [Milhol/S. 1973],
<br />As formulated, equation (I) should apply to any mixture
<br />of gravel-sized material. from uniform to poorly-sorted. so
<br />long as the reference shear stress COlTe<tl y represents the
<br />response of the bed material to the fluid forces (Le. when
<br /></>i = I, then W'i = 0.0025). Therefore, equation I should
<br />be generally applicable. The relation T, = f(dld,,),
<br />however, may vary from stream to stream depending upon
<br />the narure of the bed material, particle size-distribution,
<br />shape and packing. The extremely steep slope of the ell, vs
<br />W'; relation. when <P, ~ 1.65, however. means that
<br />relatively small errors in the reference shear SIless, T '" .
<br />will lead to substantial errors in thc predicted bedload
<br />transport rate. Thus, determination of the correct values of
<br />T',; for a given mixture of bed particles is essential.
<br />especially when calculating IlUl'ginal bedload transport .
<br />rates.
<br />Parkl!r er al. [1982] detennined the dependence of r',; on
<br />did", for Oak Creek by calcu]ating the value of r"" at a
<br />dimensionless transport rate of W'i = 0.0025. The panicle
<br />size distribution of subsurface bed material Was used for
<br />most of the analysis of Oak Creek. Their approach.
<br />however, is not limited to the subsurface material. The size
<br />distribution of surface bed material can be used, and is
<br />equally valid [Andrews and Parker, 1987]. The median
<br />particle size of surface bed material is used to scale the
<br />relative partiele protrusion because it represents the
<br />assemblage of bed panicles from whicb the bedload
<br />material is derived, [Wiberg arui Smirh, 1987, Wilcock aNi
<br />McArd.ell. 1993, and Andrews. 1994]. This approach avoids
<br />the need to assume that the partide size distribution of
<br />bedload and subsurface material are similar.
<br />WI/cock aNi Sourlu2rd [1988]. Kuhn/e [1992], and
<br />AllIirews [1994] bave taken a slightly differem approocb
<br />than Parle.T er al. [1982] used to determine the function r"
<br />
<br />.00d
<br />
<br />0991 86r OL6131
<br />
<br />= f(did,,). Inst....d of calculating the value of T'" at W'; =
<br />o 00" 5 thev varied r'. to obtain the best fit of equauon I
<br />. ...." l\ '111 '
<br />to a wide range of measured transport rates of each I Size
<br />fraction. Bedload transport rates have been measured at
<br />three of the river reaches seleeted for this aIlalysis, Middle
<br />Boulder Creek at Nedcrland. ufthand Creek near Boulder.
<br />and South Fork Cache La Poudre River near Rustic.
<br />Using these measurements. the variation of T'" with (did,,)
<br />was determined for each site. The empirically determined
<br />functions. T'" = f(d/d,.,). are shown in Figure 2 together
<br />with the previously determined functions for Oak Creek.
<br />[Parkl!r er al.. ]982] and Sagehen Creek [Andrews, 1994].
<br />The tespective equations are
<br />
<br />T'i ~ 0.033 (d/d,,)"''''
<br />
<br />(2)
<br />
<br />for Oak Creek.
<br />
<br />- ~ 00384 (dId ).....'
<br />T ri' t ~o
<br />
<br />(3)
<br />
<br />for Sagehen Creek near Truckee, CA,
<br />
<br />T, ~ 0.0354 (did,,)"''''
<br />
<br />(4)
<br />
<br />for Middle Boulder Creek at Nederland,
<br />
<br />T'ri = 0.0376 (did,,).....
<br />
<br />(5)
<br />
<br />for Lefthand Creek near Boulder,
<br />
<br />T'ri ~ oms (d/d,,).....,
<br />
<br />(6)
<br />
<br />for the South Fork Cache La Poudre River near Rustic.
<br />Among the five relations, the one determined for Middle
<br />Boulder Creek at Nellerland, is the nearest to an "average'
<br />relation over the range of (d;fd,.,) values. For a given ratio
<br />(dldso), values of the referenced dimensionless shear stress
<br />determined for the 5 streams vary no more than :!: 10
<br />percent from the Middle Boulder Creek relation. see Fig.
<br />ure 2.
<br />Bed-material transport rates for particle size fraclions
<br />from 4 11WI.180 mm over rhe range of recorded discharges
<br />were computed for the 17 sites using the Parker bedload
<br />function. The reference shear stress function, equation 5,
<br />determined for Middle Boulder Creek was applied for all
<br />sites, except Lefthand Creek and the South Fork Cache La
<br />Poudre wh= the site-specific functions w= applied.
<br />Sensitivity of the computed magnirudc and frequency of
<br />bed.material transport to uncertainty in the measured reach
<br />hydraulic charaeteristics and the streamflow regime due to
<br />an insuffieiem period of record were evaluated using the
<br />
<br />381^~3S lS3~Od VGSn
<br />
<br />n:[[ IG3MILLl-d3S
<br />
|