Laserfiche WebLink
<br />O(J2094 <br /> <br />]56 EFFECTIVE DISCHARGE AND CHAKNEL-MAINTEI'Aj\;CE FLOWS <br /> <br />where W'i = [q" (-,'" - 1)] I ffi gl." (RS)"'], <p, = T," / T'i" <br />q" is the volu=etric bedload transpon rate of the i> <br />panicle fraction per unit width of channel, f, is the percent <br />of bed particles in the i~ fraction, and g is lhe acceleration <br />of gravity. <br />An essential aspect of this approach was the development <br />of a refereDce dimensionless shear stress. TUtJ. such that 1:rl <br />= f (d/d",) where d, is the diameter of particles of the I"' <br />siu fraclion of bed material and d" is the median p:ll'licle <br />diameter of bed materia!. Parker er al. [1982J found that <br />the Use of <P,. rather than T, . resulted in a similanry <br />collapse, so that W', is approximately a single valued <br />function of cili. The Parker bedload function for the domain <br /><l>i > 1.65 was derived by tining cili and W', to the Einstein <br />bedload function. For the domain 0.95 < <1>, < 1.65, the <br />Parker bedload function was derived from bedload <br />transpon rales measured in Oak Creek [Milhol/S. 1973], <br />As formulated, equation (I) should apply to any mixture <br />of gravel-sized material. from uniform to poorly-sorted. so <br />long as the reference shear stress COlTe<tl y represents the <br />response of the bed material to the fluid forces (Le. when <br /></>i = I, then W'i = 0.0025). Therefore, equation I should <br />be generally applicable. The relation T, = f(dld,,), <br />however, may vary from stream to stream depending upon <br />the narure of the bed material, particle size-distribution, <br />shape and packing. The extremely steep slope of the ell, vs <br />W'; relation. when <P, ~ 1.65, however. means that <br />relatively small errors in the reference shear SIless, T '" . <br />will lead to substantial errors in thc predicted bedload <br />transport rate. Thus, determination of the correct values of <br />T',; for a given mixture of bed particles is essential. <br />especially when calculating IlUl'ginal bedload transport . <br />rates. <br />Parkl!r er al. [1982] detennined the dependence of r',; on <br />did", for Oak Creek by calcu]ating the value of r"" at a <br />dimensionless transport rate of W'i = 0.0025. The panicle <br />size distribution of subsurface bed material Was used for <br />most of the analysis of Oak Creek. Their approach. <br />however, is not limited to the subsurface material. The size <br />distribution of surface bed material can be used, and is <br />equally valid [Andrews and Parker, 1987]. The median <br />particle size of surface bed material is used to scale the <br />relative partiele protrusion because it represents the <br />assemblage of bed panicles from whicb the bedload <br />material is derived, [Wiberg arui Smirh, 1987, Wilcock aNi <br />McArd.ell. 1993, and Andrews. 1994]. This approach avoids <br />the need to assume that the partide size distribution of <br />bedload and subsurface material are similar. <br />WI/cock aNi Sourlu2rd [1988]. Kuhn/e [1992], and <br />AllIirews [1994] bave taken a slightly differem approocb <br />than Parle.T er al. [1982] used to determine the function r" <br /> <br />.00d <br /> <br />0991 86r OL6131 <br /> <br />= f(did,,). Inst....d of calculating the value of T'" at W'; = <br />o 00" 5 thev varied r'. to obtain the best fit of equauon I <br />. ...." l\ '111 ' <br />to a wide range of measured transport rates of each I Size <br />fraction. Bedload transport rates have been measured at <br />three of the river reaches seleeted for this aIlalysis, Middle <br />Boulder Creek at Nedcrland. ufthand Creek near Boulder. <br />and South Fork Cache La Poudre River near Rustic. <br />Using these measurements. the variation of T'" with (did,,) <br />was determined for each site. The empirically determined <br />functions. T'" = f(d/d,.,). are shown in Figure 2 together <br />with the previously determined functions for Oak Creek. <br />[Parkl!r er al.. ]982] and Sagehen Creek [Andrews, 1994]. <br />The tespective equations are <br /> <br />T'i ~ 0.033 (d/d,,)"'''' <br /> <br />(2) <br /> <br />for Oak Creek. <br /> <br />- ~ 00384 (dId ).....' <br />T ri' t ~o <br /> <br />(3) <br /> <br />for Sagehen Creek near Truckee, CA, <br /> <br />T, ~ 0.0354 (did,,)"'''' <br /> <br />(4) <br /> <br />for Middle Boulder Creek at Nederland, <br /> <br />T'ri = 0.0376 (did,,)..... <br /> <br />(5) <br /> <br />for Lefthand Creek near Boulder, <br /> <br />T'ri ~ oms (d/d,,)....., <br /> <br />(6) <br /> <br />for the South Fork Cache La Poudre River near Rustic. <br />Among the five relations, the one determined for Middle <br />Boulder Creek at Nellerland, is the nearest to an "average' <br />relation over the range of (d;fd,.,) values. For a given ratio <br />(dldso), values of the referenced dimensionless shear stress <br />determined for the 5 streams vary no more than :!: 10 <br />percent from the Middle Boulder Creek relation. see Fig. <br />ure 2. <br />Bed-material transport rates for particle size fraclions <br />from 4 11WI.180 mm over rhe range of recorded discharges <br />were computed for the 17 sites using the Parker bedload <br />function. The reference shear stress function, equation 5, <br />determined for Middle Boulder Creek was applied for all <br />sites, except Lefthand Creek and the South Fork Cache La <br />Poudre wh= the site-specific functions w= applied. <br />Sensitivity of the computed magnirudc and frequency of <br />bed.material transport to uncertainty in the measured reach <br />hydraulic charaeteristics and the streamflow regime due to <br />an insuffieiem period of record were evaluated using the <br /> <br />381^~3S lS3~Od VGSn <br /> <br />n:[[ IG3MILLl-d3S <br />