Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />-, <br /> <br />6. The Supreme Court Case of Arizona vs. California <br /> <br />As has previously been stated, the state of Arizona for over <br />twenty years after the signing of the Colorado River Compact in <br />1922, stubbornly refused to ratify the compact. The primary <br />reason for this refusal was the fact that the waters of the Gila <br />River in Arizona were clearly subject. to apportianment.pursuant'to <br />the terms of the compact. Arizona had argued during the compact. <br />negotiations that the Gila River should not be considered as part <br />of the Colorado River System for compact purposes. The compact <br />became such an explosive political issue in Arizona that no polit- <br />ical candidate dared run for public office without condemning the <br />Colorado River Compact. At least one governor threatened to use <br />armed forces (the Arizona National Guard) to prevent the con- <br />struction of reservoirs on the Colorado River which would benefit <br />California. <br /> <br />The substantial agricultural industry of Arizona is sustained <br />almost entirely by diversions from the Gila River and by heavy <br />ground water withdrawals, the latter constituting the major source. <br />Aggravated by the drouth period of the 1930's and the expanded <br />agricultural production of the World War II period and since, the <br />state of Arizona has become increasingly alarmed about its rapidly <br />dwindling ground water supply. In such a climate, the state of <br />Arizona began a massive effort to import waters from the Colorado <br />River to the Central Arizona Basin. That effort finalized into <br />the project now known as the Central Arizona Project. <br /> <br />The authorization and construction of the Central Arizona <br />Project posed a formidable legal dilemma to the state of Arizona. <br />It had not ratified the Colorado River Compact and had refused to <br />enter into a compact with the Lower Basin states as suggested by <br />Congress in the Boulder Canyon Project Act. Arizona attempted to <br />solve this sticky problem by asking the United States Supreme <br />Court ~o determine its rights on the Colorado River. The Supreme <br />Court originally refused to accept jurisdiction. Arizona finally <br />decided that it must ratify the Colorado River Compact if it were <br />to have any standing in court or in the Congress. This it did <br />during World tvar II by an act of its legislature on February 24. <br />1944. <br /> <br />After this ratification, Arizona renewed its efforts to get <br />congressional authorization of the Central Arizona Project, which <br />would export water from the lower Colorado River into the Central <br />Arizona Basin. Since there was still no agreement among the <br />Lower Basin states as to how their apportioned waters would be <br />divided among those states, the Arizona effort was strenuously <br />opposed by California and to varying degrees by the other states <br />of the Colorado River Basin. As a result of this opposition, the <br />House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs on April 18, 1951,5adopted a resolution to the effect that it would not consider any <br />legislation to authorize the Central Arizona Project until the <br /> <br />-12- <br />