Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />(;~~' '1 <br />uC'tJ <br /> <br />002.yCo\ <br /> <br />EXECUTIVE SUMMARY <br /> <br />The native fish fauna of the Colorado River basin has been greatly affected by <br />human actions that have occurred primarily since the 1930s. Four of the seven large <br />species in the "big river" assemblage are endangered and federally listed, and the <br />remaining three are species at risk. Dams, diversions, and extensive flow regulation <br />have produced significant changes in the physical environment including habitat loss <br />and fragmentation. These changes were undoubtedly a major factor in the decline of <br />the endangered fish species, but changes in the biological environment now may be an <br />equally significant threat. <br /> <br />Many nonnative fishes have been introduced into the Colorado River basin in <br />this century. Nonnative fishes were introduced by various federal and state agencies, <br />as well as by private individuals. Successful establishment of several nonnative fishes <br />(e.g., channel catfish, common carp, fathead minnow, and red shiner) has presumably <br />been facilitated by their "preadaptations' to the changed conditions now found in the <br />Colorado River system. However well-intentioned the introductions may have been, <br />the effects have been almost exclusively detrimental to the native fauna. A successful <br />introduction results not only in the addition of nonnative individuals to the receiving <br />waters, but almost always in displacement of natives, especially where the native fishes <br />occur in low abundance in isolated habitat. In the extreme, displacement can mean <br />local extirpation or complete extinction of one or more native species. <br /> <br />The threat to natural systems posed by non natives is by no means restricted to <br />the Colorado River system; it is part of a nationwide problem that is particularly acute <br />where species have been introduced intentionally to satisfy recreational or commercial <br />demands. The possibility of hastening the decline of native fishes as a direct result of <br />these fish introductions is real, and displacement has been documented in other river <br />systems, Continued decline of rare species will ultimately lead to extinction and the <br />irrevocable loss of biological diversity. This loss has widespread effects, because it <br />encompasses not only the number of native species present, but also the ecological <br />functions of those species and the genetic material they contain. <br /> <br />The scope of problems with nonnatives has been investigated at length in the <br />Upper Colorado River Basin (UCRB). There have been numerous surveys <br />documenting the distribution and abundance of nonnatives. Direct and indirect <br />evidence for the adverse impacts of non natives on the native fishes and the precarious <br />status of the native fauna is well-known. Researchers have identified control measures <br />that may be applied to most of the common nonnatives. However, a strategic plan is <br />needed to target specific nonnatives for control by selected methods in designated <br />locations. Also needed are combined efforts of many agencies, governmental and <br />private, and the cooperation of private citizens who may not be aware that nonnative <br /> <br />iv <br />