My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC04506
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC04506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:39:47 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:38:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064
Description
Indian Water Rights
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Date
6/5/1991
Author
Lois Witte
Title
Negotiating and Indian Water Rights Settlement: The Colorado Ute Indian Experience
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4142 <br /> <br />of the Interior signed a binding cost-share agreement for the <br />construction of the Animas-La Plata Project. This agreement also <br />included the parameters of the Indian water rights settlement <br />which were, in essence, the Agreement in Principal reached by <br />Colorado and the Ute Indian Tribes in March. At the time the <br />parties anticipated merely "clarifying" the March Agreement in <br />Principal. <br />The anticipated "clarification" turned into six more months <br />of intense negotiations on almost every issue, with leasing the <br />central issue. Interior had a national agenda for these Indian <br />settlements and the Colorado Ute Settlement did not fit, the mold. <br />Often Colorado and the two Ute Tribes were aligned against the <br />federal trustee. Fortunately, all parties persevered, and on <br />December 10, 1986, the Final Settlement Agreement was signed by <br />the Departments of the Interior and Justice, the State of Colo- <br />rado, the Ute Mountain Ute Indian Tribe, the Southern Ute Indian <br />Tribe, and various water conservancy districts, municipalities, <br />ditch companies, and water users in Colorado. The State of New <br />Mexico did not need to sign this agreement because it did not <br />involve New Mexico cost-sharing or New Mexico water rights. <br /> <br />III. Final Settlement Agreement <br /> <br />The Final Settlement Agreement is a complex and lengthy <br /> <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.