My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC04506
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC04506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:39:47 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:38:49 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8064
Description
Indian Water Rights
State
CO
Basin
San Juan/Dolores
Date
6/5/1991
Author
Lois Witte
Title
Negotiating and Indian Water Rights Settlement: The Colorado Ute Indian Experience
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />4150 <br /> <br />issued a revised draft biological opinion for ALP. This opinion <br />incorporated the alternative proposed by the Bureau and stated <br />that if all elements of the reasonable and prudent alternative <br />were fully implemented, the likelihood of jeopardy to the endan- <br />gered fish would be avoided. <br /> <br />VII. Current Status <br /> <br />The parties are presently negotiating a draft Memorandum of <br />Understanding ("MOU") which will be signed by the Department of <br />the Interior, the states of Colorado, New Mexico and Utah, the <br />Navajo Nation, the Southern Ute Indian Tribe, the Ute Mountain <br />Ute Indian Tribe, and the Jicarilla Apache Tribe. The MOU will <br />include agreements on measures necessary to carry out the reason- <br />able and prudent alternative for ALP and the development and <br />implementation of the Recovery Implementation Program ("RIP") for <br />the endangered fish. <br />Among other things, the RIP is intended to provide a mecha- <br />nism which will allow the United States to meet its obligations <br />under the Final Settlement Agreement. The reasonable and pru- <br />dent alternative currently under consideration does not do this <br />because it only provides for partial construction of ALP. The <br />irrigation component of ALP, which is critical to both tribes, <br />will have to undergo another section 7 consultation in the <br /> <br />-16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.