Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />CO~s1]ptive use methodologies have been developed <br /> <br />in carefully <br /> <br />controlled <br /> <br />and <br /> <br />monitored <br /> <br />research <br /> <br />plots. <br /> <br />Evapotranspiration <br /> <br />estimates produced by these methods reflect the research environment <br /> <br />in which they were obtained. <br /> <br />Actual ET expected in a commercial <br /> <br />farming operation will likely be less due to growth suppression under <br />hay windrows, infrequent and/or non-uniform irrigation, and soil <br /> <br />variability ii, ~/. <br /> <br />Correction factors may be applied to compensate <br /> <br />for these effects, however, caution must be exercised in their use to <br /> <br />assure their applicability to the given project. <br /> <br />Correction <br /> <br />factors are discussed further under "Application to Project Area". <br /> <br />Water <br /> <br />use <br /> <br />production <br /> <br />functions, <br /> <br />or <br /> <br />yield-evapotranspiration <br /> <br />relationships have been developed for various crops in many areas. <br /> <br />They relate the productivity of a given crop to the ET rate. Most <br />annual crops show a very weak correlation between ET and yield. <br />Alfalfa, however, shows a strong linear correlation in most areas, <br />and calibrated production functions of the form: <br /> <br />Y = a + b x ET (10) <br /> <br />can fit data with high coefficients of determination. <br /> <br />Figure A-I.l <br /> <br />is the recommended production function for alfalfa on the NIIP. <br /> <br />Production functions may provide an alternate method of determining <br /> <br />crop ET in certain areas ~/. <br /> <br />Known or expected yields in a gi ven area <br /> <br />can be used in the production function to determine the seasonal <br /> <br />consumptive use. <br /> <br />A comparison of various production functions <br /> <br />1- 10 <br />