My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC04363
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC04363
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/29/2009 10:10:13 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:35:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8040.950
Description
Section D General Studies-General Water Studies
State
CO
Date
4/8/1954
Author
Colorado Information
Title
Colorado Information Newsletter 1954-1955
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Publication
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
119
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />or <br /> <br />.t. ", . <br />COLORADO INFORJ 'ATION <br />NE"rSLETTER <br />Vol. 16, No.7 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />31? 17th strAet <br />Denver 2, Colorado. <br />FebruaF] 18, 1954. <br /> <br />;.po <br />'1-/ <br /> <br />Dear Subscriber: <br />Co1orado1s Second Session, 39th General Assembly adjourned last <br />week following 39 da;{s of in-Hossion time. <br />Crall1l'lled into t;.l-Je last few clays was the major part of the most <br />important and controversial of tJw bills and issues the legislature <br />was called on to face. Jettisoned IT&S a large share of Governor <br />Thornton's ,program. <br />Governor Thornton hi~self said in his Closing messa~e to the <br />combineo. houses that he felt much as he did when as a college all <br />star football player he had faced Bl'onko ;,Tagur'~ki a1 d the profession- <br />als -. the next morning, I'8,ther steamrollered c.nd beat. He promisee' <br />the legislaturo that during the next 10 days to two weeks following <br />adjournment, he wi th his ndvisoI'S and party heads would carefully <br />review all the legislation that had been passed, as well as the issues <br />that had not beoa acted upon, and would then fllnl,e known his views and <br />recommendations. <br />A suecl.al session of the legislature, perhaps in June was freely <br />predi~ted. It \':0,:3 not !l..'1tj,cipat$d that S1.:Cll. would be called l'ight <br />aWay. <br /> <br />Much post-sessl.on criticism has bgen levelled nt the Senate's <br />commUtee system wi1.ich effectively Idlled two key points of the <br />Governor's program--the withholding tax prOVision, and the referral <br />to popUlar vote of the removal of tho tax,on household gonds. <br />Senate Finance Committee, of which Senator Roy ChrYsler is. <br />chairman, a~d Judici~~y Conmdttee, of wh~ch Senator William Carlson <br />is head, reported lack of cOl11m~.ttee time to bl'ing these issues to <br />the Senate floor. <br />Both measures had received the enthusiastic approval of the <br />House, and strong words of arbitrary and capricious action were <br />levelled at the Judiciary COllllllittea for ~,ts act:lon b" Representative <br />Palmer Burch, prime mOV'lr of the me8.sure concerning household goods. <br />This tax has beon freely described in all quarters ~ the state <br />e:s_obnoxious. a nUisunce, and non-product:!. ve of income to the 3tate <br />since the administrative expense of collectin~ the tax outwei~hs the <br />revenue to the state in many cases. <br />Senator' Curlson was Rccused of changin~ the Senate rules while <br />the session w~,s goinr.; on, and subsoo,uently thp. measure 'was:..referrod <br />to his comnlittee, where, it was said, it was not brought up for <br />comuittee action. It had been one of the most popular measureS in <br />ti18 House. <br />Senator Vernon Cheever's attempts on the floor of the Senate to <br />blast th~ withholding tax bill out of the:' 'Finance CommHtee onto the <br />floOI' failed. Committee Chairman Chry~ler srotid t"I!l.t several votes <br />had been taken in committee, and each had failed to produce the <br />numbers neces:>al'y to bring the bill out. <br />This bill would have Jevi.ed a w:i.thholding tax of 5% of the fed- <br />eral. It was aimed at i tine:':m t and m~.~r[mt workers who now through <br />failure to file a return escape paying tho s tate tax. <br />Some sentiment had been el'(!Jresf\ecJ that it would be an added <br />burden to the sp.\all businC'ssman to',be responstule for calculat:l,nl'.: and <br />retuning this tax. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />2599 <br /> <br />. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.