My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC04144
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC04144
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:38:02 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:26:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.400
Description
Colorado River - Colorado River Basin - Colorado River Basin Briefing Documents/History/Corresp.
State
CO
Basin
Western Slope
Date
4/1/1951
Author
Various Authors
Title
Compilation of Resolutions, Comments, and Recommendations received by the CWCB Relating to the Reports on CRSP and Participating Projects and Gunnison River Development Plan
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />000351 <br /> <br />-11- <br /> <br />Creek and the Gunnison River. It is our firm belief that a dam constructed on <br />the Gunnison River that will store over tVIO million acre feet of water and pro- <br />d11ce over 48,000 killowats of Electric power would be more beneficial to a larger <br />~'U.'nber of citizens and tax-payers than would ~ dam constructed at Bridgeport <br />.Jhere only 80,000 acre feet of water can be stored and less than 48,000 killowats <br />of power produced. We further believe that the dam located several miles below <br />Sapinero, Colorado will eventually be of GRFAT BENRFIT not only to Montrose and <br />t:elta Counties but likewise to the County of Gunnison and the city of Gunnison. <br /> <br />We ask that you weigh the question of the location of the first Dam to be <br />constructed on the Gunnison River with the fOllowing thought in mind: "Which of <br />the two proposed dams will be the most beneficial to the largest number of <br />citizens and tax-payers". <br /> <br />Very sincerely yours, <br />Consolidated Offices of the Road Committees <br />of Hotchkiss, Colorado <br />and Crawford, Colorado <br /> <br />By Leslie J. Savage <br />Chairman of the Road Committee <br /> <br />**********n*******KX'~*1~W <br /> <br />Judge Clifford stone and Associates, <br />Colo. Water Conservation Board <br />Denver, Colorado <br /> <br />Delta, Colorado--April 12th 1951 <br /> <br />Gentlemen: <br />It is the desire of this committee to protect the western slope and its <br />economic future on the Gunnison River with the recommendation for construction of <br />Curecanti Reservoir primarily, since the findings of the engineers are that it <br />will give us greater generation of electrical power and greater storage of water <br />than any other project examined in this region. We feel that Curecanti Reservoir <br />must be given precedence over any other dam on the Gunnison River because it is <br />agreed by the engineers that it will be the most economic in its costs of con- <br />struction and that is the only basis to fully protect the tax-payers dollar, which <br />should be protected first under the present set-up. Curecanti Reservoir will have <br />a minimum of silting and evaporation "lith maximum of results for power and irriga- <br />tion within the Gunnison River area. <br /> <br />Curecanti Dam is the only dam proposed on the Gunnison River which will <br />"tore water for more than one year to the next year. This storage is needed to <br />aS3UI'e deli very of water to meet the terms of the 1922 compact and some water will <br />be held as much as 25 years to guarantee deli very in low run-off years like 1931 <br />and 1940. Since the water will be committed under compact_it cannot be diverted. <br />Bridgeport, near '.'lhitewater, wont hold any Imver basin water, its capacity, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.