My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC04106
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC04106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:37:51 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:25:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8541
Description
San Luis Valley Project
State
CO
Basin
Rio Grande
Water Division
3
Date
1/28/1982
Author
J William McDonald
Title
San Luis Valley Project Closed Basin Division - 1982 - Memorandum: Agenda Item 10, February 5, 1982 Board Meeting, Closed Basin Project
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Board Memo
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />0011~5 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />be $1,040,500 while that for fish and wildlife features is <br />$204,000. The total non-federal construction cost is <br />$1,244,500, Annual operation and maintenance costs, a state <br />obligation, are projected to be $87,000, <br /> <br />The combined non-federal construction costs for land <br />acquisition and enhancement features are as follows: <br /> <br />Land <br />Enhancement <br /> <br />$ 222,750 <br />1,244,500 <br /> <br />Total <br /> <br />$1,467,250 <br /> <br />Discussion <br /> <br />The only ~oney appropriated by the legislature thus far <br />for the nearly $1.5 million of non-federal costs is the <br />$500,000 authorized for expenditure from the Board's construc- <br />tion fund by SB 537 (1979 Session). This leaves the state <br />about $1 million short. <br /> <br />The Bureau has advised that a repayment contract for the <br />enhancement features must be executed before construction can <br />be initiated on stage 3 of the project this summer, However, <br />actual payments from the state will not be needed, at the <br />earliest, until January of 1983. Furthermore, the typical <br />repayment contract with the Bureau would make the state's <br />obligations contingent upon future 'appropriations by the <br />legislature. Since $500,000 has already been authorized from <br />the construction fund, an additional appropriation is not <br />needed at this time, <br /> <br />The Colorado wildlife Commission, at its January meeting, <br />adopted a motion in support of using wildlife cash funds in the <br />amount of $204,000, Assuming that the legiSlature favored this <br />proposal, then $763,250 above and beyond the $500,000 of <br />already authorized construction fund monies would still be <br />needed at some future date. <br /> <br />Recommendations <br /> <br />I recommend that the Board: <br /> <br />1, Support and approve of the new proposed mitigation and <br />enhancement plans, <br /> <br />2, Urge the Colorado Congressional delegation to seek <br />passage of a bill amending the original authorizing <br />legislation to provide for the new proposed mitigation <br />and enhancement plans. <br /> <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.