Laserfiche WebLink
<br />003190 <br /> <br />Some exploratory statistical experiments have suggested that a 5 to 15 pct increase in seasonal <br />snowfall can be achieved. Perhaps the best known experiment is the Climax, Colorado, program <br />of the 1960s, the only winter experiment to date that incorporated a confirmatory phase after <br />the exploratory phase. Some of the initial suggestions did appear to be confirmed (Mielke et al., <br />1971), and the results generally were accepted by the scientific community for a time. Mielke et <br />al. (1981) dealt with a possible type I statistical error (a chance selection of seeded and <br />nonseeded days that favored an erroneous statistical conclusion of increased snowfall caused by <br />seeding). However, serious challenges to the Climax experiments appeared in the open scientific <br />literature (Hobbs and Rangno, 1979; Rhea, 1983; Rangno and Hobbs, 1987). The Climax <br />statistical results now are viewed with skepticism by many scientists, in part because of the <br />lack of supporting physical observations. The Climax experiments were conducted in complex <br />terrain with a modest budget before the development of much of the instrumentation in <br />common use today. Hence, routine monitoring of the key physical mechanisms involved was not <br />then practical. <br /> <br />Several winter seeding experiments were attempted in the West during the late 1960s and <br />early 1970s, but major funding cutbacks terminated all but Reclamation's CRBPP (Colorado <br />River Basin Pilot Project) after about 1973; the CRBPP continued through 1975. Most of the <br />experiments were inconclusive. Two exceptions are the Bridger Range Experiment, which will <br />be discussed later, and the Cascade Project. The Cascade Project was a pioneering effort in <br />physical evaluation of seeding experiments which produced some of the most convincing <br />. evidence available that seeding can modify snowfall when properly applied under some <br />conditions (Hobbs, 1975a; Hobbs and Radke, 1975; Hobbs, 1975b). The Cascade Project did not <br />address the magnitudes of the changes that might be achieved on a seasonal basis over a large <br />area. To do so would have required a multiple winter statistical experiment for which funding <br />was not available. <br /> <br />, <br />, <br />~ <br /> <br />The CRBPP, discussed by Elliott et al. (1978), found no significant difference in precipitation <br />from seeded and nonseeded days. However, at least two serious design problems were <br />discovered involving inadequate T&D of the seeding agent and inability to forecast cloud top <br />temperatures and winds. Thus, CRBPP results must be considered inconclusive, meaning the <br />evidence supported neither the conclusion that seeding could enhance snowfall nor the <br />conclusion that seeding was incapable of increasing snowfall. Elliott et al. (1978) reanalyzed the <br />data set and concluded that precipitation increases of 10 pct or more could have been achieved if <br />seeding had been limited to only favorable cloud conditions. Also, a limited number of physical <br />studies during the last season of the CRBPP provided evidence that seeding potential exists in <br />the latter stage of winter storms over the San Juan Mountains associated with the release of <br />convective instability (Cooper and Marwitz, 1980). <br /> <br />l <br /> <br />Since the end of the CRBPP, the only major winter orographic cloud seeding project conducted <br />in the West was the SCPP (Sierra Cooperative Pilot Project) reviewed by Reynolds and Dennis <br />(1986). The main purpose of the SCPP was to determine when seeding of cold winter clouds over <br />the central Sierra Nevada of California produced increases, decreases, or no change in <br />precipitation, and to document the magnitude of the changes. In addition, extensive physical <br />studies were conducted of three-dimensional airflow and microphysical processes (both cloud <br />liquid water and ice processes) occurring in natural winter cloud systems. Examples include <br />Heggli et al. (1983), Heggli and Rauber (1988), Marwitz (1987a), and Marwitz (1987b). These <br />studies led to the development of an analytical targeting model (Rauber et al., 1988) that was <br />used the last 3 yr of the program (1984-1986). The latter years of the SCPP emphasized <br /> <br />7 <br />