My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC03842
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC03842
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:36:31 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:13:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8210.761.09.D
Description
Colorado River-Federal Agencies-US NPS-Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
10/10/2003
Title
2003 Settlement Agreement-Implementation-Water Deal on Hold for Black Canyon
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
News Article/Press Release
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Denver Post 10/10/03 <br /> <br />,.._....___ ___1 __ 11-_1-1 ~___ _1__1_ _______ <br />."au::.- Ut:c::II VII IIUIU IU'- DICU,';I\. \..ClIIYUII <br /> <br />A state water court judge has temporarily blocked the U.S. Department of Interior and the state of <br />Colorado from proceeding with a deal that environmentalists say would sacrifice high flows in the <br />Black Canyon of the Gunnison for future economic development on the Front Range. <br />Judge Steven Patrick issued a stay Monday that will prevent the case from moving forward until legal <br />issues in a related federal case are resolved. <br />A coalition of five citizen groups sued the Interior Department and Interior Secretary Gale Norton in <br />September, arguing the government had failed to protect the park's ecological, recreational and <br />aesthetic values by relinquishing a federal water right through the park to state officials. <br />They have asked the federal court to invalidate the closed- door deal between Colorado and the <br />Interior Department under which the federal government would relinquish the water right. <br />Under that accord, the government would rely mostly on a state-held 2003 water right to protect park <br />resources. The deal would allot water to the park only after meeting every other water need, including <br />potentially huge Front Range diversions, said Bart Miller of Western Resource Advocates, one of the <br />plaintiffs in the case. <br /> <br />002356 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.