My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WSPC03816
CWCB
>
Water Supply Protection
>
Backfile
>
16000-16999
>
WSPC03816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2010 11:36:25 AM
Creation date
10/9/2006 4:12:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Water Supply Protection
File Number
8200.700
Description
Colorado River Basin General Publications - Augmentation-Weather Modification
State
CO
Basin
Colorado Mainstem
Water Division
5
Date
11/1/1983
Title
Value of Electric Power and Possible Effects of Weather Modification on Small-Scale Hydroelectric Production in Colorado
Water Supply Pro - Doc Type
Report/Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />003418 <br /> <br />The first step to getting a license to build and operate a small-scale <br />hydroelectric facility is to apply to the FERC for a permit to develop <br />a site. The permit application estimstes, sometimes rather crudely, <br />the power cspabilities of the site, supplies information on the <br />developer and so forth. Good information on sites is not available <br />until after a license is issued; only then is the developer assured he <br />will eventuslly be able to operate the facility, so only then is <br />detailed engineering work done. No potential developer in Colorado has <br />received a license and most developers have not been issued a permit. <br />For this reason the information on the potential sites is not good. and <br />figures supplied for the FERC applications are not precise. <br /> <br />A case-by-case survey of FERC permit applications reveals the <br />information contained in Table 3.2. We have categorized facilities <br />into four groups, separated by basic differences in hydro <br />technologies. Facilities to be constructed at sites where dams exist <br />predominate. In most of these cases the task of the hydro developer is <br />to add the facilities needed to generate power. There are forty such <br />projects under way in the state. Since five of these are rather large <br />(20 mw or larger), they are shown separately. There are 13 proposals <br />to install turbines on irrigation ditches and conduits: average <br />capacities are 1.45 mw. Run-of-river situations (which will be <br />described in greater detail below) are fewer; six sites have average <br />capacity of 1.06 mw. Capacities at four sites attached to the outflow <br />from municipal water treatment plants average 7.01 mw. (Four FERC <br />applications were also exsmined where the data did not permit <br />categorization.) <br /> <br />The total potential capacity reflected in the FERC applications is <br />343.6 mw. If this capacity were developed, it would increase the <br />state's total generation capability by about six percent and hydro <br />capacity by more than 68 percent. <br /> <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.